Google
WWW CareCure Forums

Go Back   CareCure Forums > News Forums > Ability & Disability News

Ability & Disability News News stories of abilities and disabilities

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2002, 06:58 AM   #1
antiquity
Moderator
 
antiquity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,540
$6.5 Million Is Awarded for Campground Injury

$6.5 Million Is Awarded for Campground Injury

By John Caher
New York Law Journal

A Court of Claims judge has awarded over $6.5 million on behalf of a boy who suffered a spinal cord injury when a rotted tree at a state campground tumbled onto a camper.

Presiding Judge Susan Phillips Read said the high award is necessary to cover the future medical needs of Joseph A. Gugliotta and to compensate the youth for what is likely to be several decades of pain and suffering.

The award in Gugliotta v. State, 96538, came nearly three years after another Court of Claims judge found the state fully liable for the July 15, 1995, accident even though the state did not have actual knowledge of the dangerous condition.

Now-retired Judge James P. King predicated the state's liability on constructive knowledge. Judge King found the state's "duty to remove hazardous trees in high use areas on state owned land is somewhat more circumscribed than the duty imposed on an adjoining landowner whose tree or portion of a tree falls on his neighbor's property or person."

He also held that the state's potential liability in falling tree cases was not limited to those matters where there is a readily observable defect. Rather, Judge King said the state is responsible even when there are "subtle indications of tree decay."

For the Gugliotta family, that added up to more than $6.5 million, including $2.2 million for future home services and $1 million for future pain and suffering.

Records show that Joseph Gugliotta was an active and athletic 5-year-old when he went camping with his family at North/South Lake Camp Ground in Haines Falls, Greene County.

On a stormy morning, the boy and his brother were sleeping in a pop-up camper when a large Canadian Hemlock fell on the unit. Joseph suffered a spinal injury. Now, he can walk only with braces or crutches, often uses a wheelchair and requires diapers and a catheter. Joseph plays wheelchair basketball and takes part in other activities, but is unable to enjoy life to the fullest.

"[H]e will require lifelong medical surveillance and prophylactic care for the management of his condition and the prevention of complications, as well as equipment and services and accommodations to allow him to live an independent and productive life," Judge Read wrote.

Robert George Bombara of Garden City appeared for the Gugliotta family. Assistant Attorney General Michael Friedman argued for the state.

Date Received: December 06, 2002 Â*

http://www6.law.com/lawcom/displayid...news&flag=full
antiquity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 08:46 AM   #2
Max
Senior Member
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal,Province of Quebec, CANADA
Posts: 15,036
Send a message via MSN to Max Send a message via Yahoo to Max Send a message via Skype™ to Max
Do'nt

We have new forum for these kind of posts?
Max is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 03:28 PM   #3
antiquity
Moderator
 
antiquity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,540
Max, please read the post about the Disability News forum. Life articles that mention SCI will continue to be posted in the Life forum. Articles that don't mention SCI but deal with general disability issues such as insurance, employment, the ADA, etc., are to be posted in the Disability News forum. That's why I only posted 1 article here and 5 in the new forum.

Thanks

OTOH, if this is going to become an issue of contention, I'll refrain from posting SCI articles here until Dr. Young returns to explain better.

[This message was edited by seneca on Dec 08, 2002 at 06:45 PM.]
antiquity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 04:46 PM   #4
Max
Senior Member
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal,Province of Quebec, CANADA
Posts: 15,036
Send a message via MSN to Max Send a message via Yahoo to Max Send a message via Skype™ to Max
You are confusing me again...

That is why I insisted on clear poll, if you do remeber...And I still feel that Clippers poll would serve better. But you insisted on your version...Please check what was questons in your own poll,your comment and what majority of users voted for

What diffrence poll made-if majority clearly voted on all articles, but moderators & administration do what they please?

BTW, I already started posting sci related articles on new forum

[This message was edited by Max on Dec 08, 2002 at 07:55 PM.]
Max is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 05:48 PM   #5
antiquity
Moderator
 
antiquity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,540
Max, I don't want a flame or an argument. Dr. Young will explain when he returns.

BTW, before you try to make this personal, the disability news forum was not my idea. The decision to leave SCI specific articles in Life and put general disability articles in the new forum was made by Dr. Young. He doesn't mind having a few articles here, he just wanted to limit them so that they don't push other topics onto the next page. Peace?
antiquity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2002, 05:54 PM   #6
Max
Senior Member
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal,Province of Quebec, CANADA
Posts: 15,036
Send a message via MSN to Max Send a message via Yahoo to Max Send a message via Skype™ to Max
But don't you see a contradiction here.

One thing what majority voted for & another what we have.

And it is nothing personal, its just a matter of principle.


Peace

Since poll is sinking I decided to add this(Just in case poll topic may mysteriously disapppear as recently happen to one of my posts)
Still its nothing personal -just a reminder.

Seneca wrote-"Yes, based on my interpretation of Dr. Young's suggestion, all articles about SCI/disability that are normally posted in Life will be posted in the Disability News forum instead."

[This message was edited by Max on Dec 09, 2002 at 10:48 AM.]
Max is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2002, 10:56 AM   #7
topspin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 174
LLLLEET's get ready to RRRRUUUUUUUMMMMMMBBLLLEEEEE (copyright notwithstanding)

There are eight new posts in the Travel and Sports Forum to add to this discussion, which you two (Max and Seneca) have yet to add as fuel to the fire.

Max, I have a technical question: What form of "search engine" do you use to peruse the latest publications for SCI related, either directly or indirectly, articles? No kidding, and I do mean "please", start a thread and explain the process.

That said, I think you, Max, also need to acknowledge the "ownership" of your hobby, which is to post the articles in forums, nevermind that there seems to be an aversion by the reading population on the true "do a good turn daily" (scout slogan, thank you Baden-Powell) aspect of the hobby. You have your fans and you have your detractors, you must admit. Neutrality allowed, the latter outnumbers the former.

These are called "temendous trifles" in the realm of human endeavor. I just wish they were not so tremendous
topspin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2002, 01:10 PM   #8
Max
Senior Member
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal,Province of Quebec, CANADA
Posts: 15,036
Send a message via MSN to Max Send a message via Yahoo to Max Send a message via Skype™ to Max
Yessssss Topspin,

Thanks for acknowlegement

I am also an inventor...If Al Gore invented internet, I've invented concept of sci-news posting
Max is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2002, 02:48 PM   #9
nate007
Senior Member
 
nate007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, manitoba, canada
Posts: 667
There just aren't enough people to annoy in those other forums.
nate007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2002, 03:55 PM   #10
antiquity
Moderator
 
antiquity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,540
Quote:
Originally posted by Max:


Since poll is sinking I decided to add this(Just in case poll topic may mysteriously disapppear as recently happen to one of my posts)
Still its nothing personal -just a reminder.

Seneca wrote-"Yes, based on my interpretation of Dr. Young's suggestion, all articles about SCI/disability that are normally posted in Life will be posted in the Disability News forum instead."

[This message was edited by Max on Dec 09, 2002 at 10:48 AM.]
Max, you requested that the poll topic be removed from the top, remember? Unless someone else posts a comment, it will sink. And what post of yours disappeared?

I tried to convey a new message to you about article posts which you took issue with, so in an effort to avoid further confusion on your part, I said I'd wait for Dr. Young to explain but until he's able, all articles will go to the new forum which has been the case since yesterday. What you complained about has been resolved, so what's the new problem?

If the administrators decide otherwise, a notice will be posted by one of them.

Posted by topspin:
Quote:
These are called "temendous trifles" in the realm of human endeavor. I just wish they were not so tremendous
Me too topspin.

[This message was edited by seneca on Dec 09, 2002 at 07:20 PM.]
antiquity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM.



"CC Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2013, Cracked Egg Studios.