![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Care Health and wellness for those with spinal cord injury and related disabilities |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,867
|
Non sterile KY Jelly?
I just called Johnson and Johnson, the manufacturer of KY Jelly, and they told me that 4oz. tubes of sterile KY Jelly will no longer be made. They do still make 4oz. tubes of NON-sterile KY Jelly. When I catheterize myself, I use a clean technique by washing my hands and lubricating the new, sterile catheter by inserting the it right into the tube of sterile KY Jelly. I haven't had a UTI in 4 years. Would it make any difference if the KY Jelly I use in the future is "non sterile" and only used for catheterizations? Should I look for another brand of lubricant? I hate to screw up a good thing. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,205
|
Hmm, I use the same technique you do except I use a bacteriostatic lube called Muko from the medical supply place. I think it's almost sterile but not technically sterile. It comes in the little packets too.
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow" ~ Anon |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
|
I don't think it will matter because once you open the serile tube, it's no longer sterile. I've only used the non sterile generic lube.
_____ Learn from the mistakes of others, you won't live long enough to make all of them yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,867
|
Muko? Sounds like something from a swamp!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 41,515
|
Since you are using a new, sterile cath each time it shouldn't be an issue at all.
I agree with jimnms too that once the tube is open it is no longer completely sterile. If you are using clean technique otherwise everything should be fine. 90% of all UTI's are caused by urinary retention or urine left in the bladder after a void. The other 10% can be attributed to such things as reflux or high pressure problems, catheterization technique or catheter used. PLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 41,515
|
I would just add that it is most important that you use separate tubes for bowel care and bladder care, and carefully label them to avoid getting them mixed up. This can be an important source of how bowel bacteria get into the bladder.
Also, there are many brands of surgical sterile lubricant other than KY. If you want to use a sterile product, here are a few others: Triad Fougera Harvard Pilgrim You can also still find sterile KY: Sterile KY jelly I believe Muco is not available in the USA. (KLD) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 41,515
|
Thanks KLD ! PLG
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
|
Alternate to KY Jelly
I found a good altnernate to KY Jelly. Click here to check out Surgilube -
http://www.allegromedical.com/urolog...e-p193139.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,514
|
I used to use sterile KY many years ago. It’s not really necessary for people who can use the clean cath technique. I have been using cheap generic KY-type lubricant for at least 8 or 10 years now. I buy it from Walmart or Target.
What KLD says about keeping your cath and bowel lubricants completely separate is extremely important. I once made the mistake of mixing them up and got a killer mean UTI. My urologist told me that even the slightest amount of fecal material can cause an infection that is most hard to get rid of. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
http://www.exmed.net/product.asp?dep...f_id=FOU0205xx |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|