Google
WWW CareCure Forums

Go Back   CareCure Forums > Research Forums > Brain Injury & Stroke Research

Brain Injury & Stroke Research Recent brain injury and stroke studies

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2009, 08:05 AM   #1
wildwilly
Moderator
 
wildwilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,775
Is forced use of the paretic upper limb beneficial?

Clin Rehabil. 2009 Mar 25.

Is forced use of the paretic upper limb beneficial? A randomized pilot study during subacute post-stroke recovery.

Hammer A, Lindmark B.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Orebro University Hospital, and the School of Health and Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of two weeks of forced use of the paretic upper limb, as a supplement to the rehabilitation programme in the subacute phase after stroke, on self-rated use of that limb.Design: A randomized, non-blind, parallel group, clinical, before-and-after trial. A forced use group and a conventional group were followed up one and three months after intervention.Setting: In- and outpatient units of rehabilitation at a University Hospital.Subjects: Thirty patients were allocated to two groups, 15 in each, 1-6 months (mean 2.4) after stroke onset. Twenty-six patients completed the study.Interventions: The patients of both groups participated in two weeks of daily training on weekdays. In addition, the forced use group wore a restraining sling on the non-paretic arm for up to 6 hours per weekday.Main measure: The Motor Activity Log; patients scored 0-5 for 30 daily tasks concerning both amount of use and quality of movement.Results: The forced use group tended to achieve larger improvements immediately post-intervention, but this was not clearly demonstrated. The small differences also levelled out up to the three-month follow-up, with both groups earning an approximately 1.0 score point on both scales of the Motor Activity Log.Conclusions: This pilot study did not reveal any additional benefit of forced use on self-rated performance in daily use of the paretic upper limb. Both groups performed fairly extensive, active training with a similar duration, amount and content.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19321522?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez. Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.P ubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles& logdbfrom=pubmed
__________________
“As the cast of villains in SCI is vast and collaborative, so too must be the chorus of hero's that rise to meet them” Ramer et al 2005

Last edited by wildwilly; 04-19-2009 at 08:11 AM. Reason: Spelling
wildwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors wildwilly Brain Injury & Stroke Research 0 08-20-2008 01:13 PM
Resistance-based, reciprocal upper and lower limb locomotor training in chronic CVA wildwilly Brain Injury & Stroke Research 0 07-02-2008 11:55 AM
National Registry for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [ Lou Gehrig Disease ] ALS. BobbyB Tranverse Myelitis, Multiple Sclerosis, Non-traumatic SCI 0 09-12-2005 08:31 PM
Changes of non-affected upper limb cortical representation in paraplegic patients as assessed by fMRI antiquity SCI (Clinical) Research 0 11-02-2002 04:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.



"CC Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2013, Cracked Egg Studios.