![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Care Health and wellness for those with spinal cord injury and related disabilities |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Super Pubic Catheter
Can anyone that has one tell me the positives and negatives compared to an indwelling? Does it get in the way while having sex?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,595
|
A buddy of mine has a suprapubic catheter and swears by it. The stoma (hole) comes out on the right-side of his belly just above the beltline I believe. I think he has to irrigate it every so often with saline solution or something. I don't think it gets in the way of sex, but I didn't ask him. I think infections aren't as common with a suprapubic, but I'm not sure. One advantage over the Foley, in my opinion, is that you don't have a rubber tube irritating the urethra constantly. My buddy had to get the SP because the foley actually wore a fistula in the urethra, and his scrotum filled with urine--yikes!
~Rus "Because you're not promised tomorrow." ~ Stuck Mojo |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Houston, Tx. USA
Posts: 1,888
|
I have a SP catheter and am not sure what I would do without it. I have never had any problems other than the area around it needs to be kept clean. It gets irritated every once in awhile, but has not been a problem. It is a little bit sensitive around the area where it goes in to my stomach occasionally causing my blood pressure to rise when the tube is moved or pulled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 866
|
SP vs. urethral
The main advantages of a SP vs. a urethral indwelling catheter are:
1) less damage to the urethra (strictures, diverticuli, fistulas, patulous [stretched out] urethra)with a SP. 2) less interference with genital sexual activity (in men esp.)with a SP vs. a urethral catheter. I have never seen a SP that came out of the abdomen at the belly button level or to the side...it should be just above the pubic bone in the mid-line. Suspect the person you know has some type of urinary ostomy instead. The risks for UTI, stones, bladder cancer, etc. are the same for urethral vs. SP indwelling catheters. The SP can be temporary if desired. If you have one, be sure the placement is correct or you can have problems with drainage (have it done by an SCI experienced urologist). |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,844
|
.
Quote:
there are more positives than negatives in having one. if something is "unusual and not flowing" then something is wrong and just takes antibiotic, or different placement how it lays on your body, different insertion practices while changing, etc to accomodate. like anything, after a short time, you find what will work for you best. is this the monte that post yrs ago? wow, long time. hope life is treating you well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
|
Has anyone had a problem getting an erection since getting a Super Pubic Catheter?
My urologist suggests i get a sphincterotomy because the high pressure in my bladder is causing my kidneys to swell with urine, but i'm worried about erectile disfunction. Will a spc be able to eliminate the high pressure? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,595
|
KLD, I didn't actually see the suprapubic stoma, just assumed it was up higher than the belt-line. I guess I assumed it would get pinched if it were lower, but it probably wouldn't drain well if it was up that high, huh?
![]() ~Rus "Because you're not promised tomorrow." ~ Stuck Mojo |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Posts: 37,972
|
A suprapubic catheter is, by definition, inserted just above the pubis. It must be low because that is where the bladder is and the catheter goes directly into the bladder.
Intestinal conduits for the ureters involve using a piece of the intestine as a reservoir for collecting and delivering the urine ot the stoma. There are a variety of surgical procedures. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Denver, CO USA
Posts: 101
|
Super Pubic Cath
My husband has had a supertube for 27 of the 28 years he's been injured. It is low enough to be out of the way of clothing. I think KLD and Wise answered the medical part. But for the spouse part NO it is not in the way for sex. I just have to be careful not to roll on the tubing to the night bag. It is a little uncomfortable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
Thanks for all the replies.
One other thing I was wondering about....anyone have any problems bypassing with a SP...as of now I have never bypassed with an indwelling and really don't want that problem. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|