Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Truth or scare? Technology myths put the test

  1. #1
    Senior Member Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Montreal,Province of Quebec, CANADA
    Posts
    15,036

    Wink Truth or scare? Technology myths put the test

    Truth or scare? Technology myths put the test

    Would your plane really crash if you switched on your mobile? And can a fork blow up a microwave? Simon Usborne puts technology myths to the test
    Wednesday, 2 April 2008

    Mobile phones can cause planes to crash, life-support machines to fail and petrol stations to blow up

    For as long as mobile phones have existed, we have been told that there are certain places where we must not – under any circumstances – use them. We were told that mobiles could interfere with the computers that keep planes in the air, and that a simple call to say "we're just taking off" could trigger a disaster. Yet, last week, the UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, confirmed it would allow mobiles to be used on UK-registered planes. So were those disastrous possibilities made up? And what does this mean for the other mobile phone bans? After all, we're also told that making calls on petrol station forecourts can trigger explosions, and that if we use them in hospitals, sensitive equipment, such as life-support systems, could fail.
    "There is practically no evidence to say mobile phones pose a risk," says Dr Adam Burgess, sociology lecturer at Kent University and the author of Cellular Phones, Public Fears and a Culture of Precaution. In the case of hospitals, Burgess cites a 10-year-old study that found mobiles affected only 4 per cent of hospital equipment, only 0.1 per cent of it seriously. "And technology has moved on since then, so the risk today is even lower." What about exploding petrol stations? Are we really doomed if we send a text or make a call while filling up? Don't panic, says Dr Burgess, who believes the culture of precaution in the petroleum industry dates back to the 1988 Piper Alpha disaster. "But the risk from phones was always hypothetical," he says. "In America, there have been claims that explosions at petrol stations were down to mobiles. But the explosions have since been found to be caused by sparks from the static on peoples' clothes as they get out of their cars. The claims against mobiles are based on no evidence."
    Verdict: myth – as far as we can tell. But don't go calling your stockbroker from the intensive care ward just yet.
    Flatscreens are worse for your eyes than traditional monitors
    It pains me to do the maths, but it's quite easy for an office worker to notch up 60 hours a week staring at a computer screen, whether deleting spam, fielding unwanted Facebook pokes at home or even getting something useful done. The College of Optometrists estimates each of us spends, on average, an astonishing three and a half months a year in front of one sort of screen or other.
    "Our eyes were never designed to look at one thing for so long," says Keith Holland, an optometrist in Cheltenham. "They are built to move, change focus, and take in the periphery." It's no surprise, then, that too much screen time isn't great for your eyes. "Your blink rate goes down, which can lead to discomfort and spasms of the focal muscles," Holland explains. "In people with a family history of myopia, intensive screen work can bring on short-sightedness faster."
    But what about claims that flat screens, which have all but consigned the old bulky cathode-ray tube monitors to the great scrapheap in the sky, can pose greater health risks? That's the message given out by one online firm, which is selling protective "office glasses". Flat-screen monitors, the company says, "radiate mercury frequencies... which make vision more difficult and show a damaging effect on metabolic processes in cell experiments." Should we be worried?
    "It's a 100 per cent con," says Holland. "There's no evidence to back up these claims whatsoever – flat screens are not inherently dangerous."
    Tim Hunter, an optometrist at a Leeds teaching hospital, says that, in fact, flatscreens are less damaging than many older cathode-ray monitors, which worked by redrawing the screen many times a second. Most people's minds had no problem putting the images together to form moving pictures, but some saw a flickering, which could lead to head-aches and, in extreme cases, even epileptic fits.
    Verdict: it's a myth – flatscreens are generally better for you.
    Airport security scanners cause pacemakers to malfunction
    Removing our shoes and emptying our pockets as we're herded through airport security checks is a hassle. But what if your life depends on a metal gadget you can't throw into a little plastic tray? Are scanners potentially deadly to those who have artificial pacemakers?
    In 2003, a German study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology showed no interference when 200 participants with pacemakers walked through standard airport security equipment.
    But the British Heart Foundation tells patients not to pass through metal detectors. Cardiac nurse Judy O'Sullivan explains why: "Magnetic interference from airport scanners can change the speed setting of a pacemaker, which means it needs to be reset. It might make its wearer feel dizzy or could lead to palpitations." Pacemaker patients are advised to request a wand search, which should avoid the chest.
    Verdict: It's true!

    It's extremely dangerous to put any metal object into a microwave
    Video-sharing websites are awash with clips of reckless youths loading the ubiquitous ovens with, variously, a light bulb (which lights up, then explodes), a propane-filled balloon (which blows both microwave and table to pieces) and a singing Furby toy (which ignites, goes quiet, then dies). But why do microwave manuals tell us never, ever, to stick metal in the microwave?
    "The absorption of microwaves by metal is much higher than by food or liquid. That means metal gets very hot and an electric current builds up. These currents can lead to high voltages which can cause sparks to fly from the object to the microwave casing," says Damian Hampshire, a physics professor at Durham University. "The sparks can damage the electronic components in the magnetron – the device that turns mains electricity into microwaves."

    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...st-803430.html

  2. #2
    Speaking of fun things to do in a microwave, has anyone ever tried the exploding grape thing? You cut a large, green grape almost completely in have, such that the halves are touching by just a little sliver at the bottom. Put the grape in the microwave and crank it up. The voltage difference between the two halves will cause an arc that turns into a small ball of plasma, which sometimes rises up from the grape and floats around inside the microwave. Safe as far as I can tell, I've done it quite a few times to impress the kids.

  3. #3
    Senior Member rdf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Someplace between Nowhere and Goodbye
    Posts
    12,972
    Quote Originally Posted by Zero
    Speaking of fun things to do in a microwave, has anyone ever tried the exploding grape thing? You cut a large, green grape almost completely in have, such that the halves are touching by just a little sliver at the bottom. Put the grape in the microwave and crank it up. The voltage difference between the two halves will cause an arc that turns into a small ball of plasma, which sometimes rises up from the grape and floats around inside the microwave. Safe as far as I can tell, I've done it quite a few times to impress the kids.
    Sounds a hell of a lot cheaper than taking them to the movies
    Please donate a dollar a day at http://justadollarplease.org.
    Copy and paste this message to the bottom of your signature.

    Thanks!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    connecticut
    Posts
    8,272
    Then there is the marshmallow peeps thing. They just puff up and up until .... well they become a sticky mess to clean up. LOL.
    T7-8 since Feb 2005

Similar Threads

  1. Stem cells put to the test in UNC studies
    By Max in forum Health & Science News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-20-2002, 08:24 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-10-2002, 05:06 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-21-2002, 08:09 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2002, 04:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •