Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: SHAME, SHAME, SHAME: Bush got a nasty reception when he visited Denver after the veto

  1. #1
    Banned Faye's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    6,839

    Thumbs up SHAME, SHAME, SHAME: Bush got a nasty reception when he visited Denver after the veto

    DAVID ZALUBOWSKI / AP
    Bush got a nasty reception when he visited Denver after the veto
    From the Magazine | Science
    The Politics of Science

    Democrats smell a political winner in stem cells, but both parties are holding their fire. Will the issue count in November?
    By KAREN TUMULTY/WASHINGTON
    SUBSCRIBE TO TIMEPRINTE-MAILMORE BY AUTHOR
    Posted Monday, Jul. 31, 2006
    The politics of stem-cell research, just like the science of it, is turning out to be far more complicated than either side would like you to think. From the press releases, fund-raising appeals and victory cries that were going up in the hours after President George W. Bush used his veto for the first time, it may have looked as though the Democrats had finally found their golden issue--and a social one at that. "With one stroke of his pen," declared Democratic chairman Howard Dean, "President Bush has once again denied hope to millions of Americans and their families who suffer from diabetes, spinal-cord injuries and Alzheimer's." Added Massachusetts Congressman Ed Markey: "This will be remembered as a Luddite moment in American history."

    Democrats were right about one thing. The issue has put Republicans in an uncomfortable spot. White House press secretary Tony Snow apologized last week for saying that Bush considers stem-cell research "murder," explaining that his earlier comment was "overstating the President's position." That rectification came after White House chief of staff Josh Bolten endured an inquisition on Meet the Press, in which host Tim Russert demanded to know whether the President's stance against destroying embryos applied not just to federal funding of stem-cell research but also to shutting down the entire field of in vitro fertilization. The answer was a sort-of no.

    But so far at least, stem-cell research hasn't rewritten the electoral equation the way many Democrats had hoped it would. The most telling indicator, as always, is how candidates and interest groups are spending their money. A week after the veto, campaign strategists in both parties said they didn't know of a single state or congressional district where a candidate was running an ad on the issue. Only one independent organization, the liberal Campaign to Defend the Constitution, has run national advertising about it, buying $250,000 worth of ads in the New York Times and an additional $100,000 worth online.

    MORE

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...220522,00.html

    "There’s far too much unthinking respect given to authority,” Molly Ivins explained; “What you need is sustained outrage.”
    Kerr, Keirstead, McDonald, Stice and Jun Yan courageously work on ESCR to Cure SCI.

    Divisiveness comes from not following Christopher Reeve's ESCR lead.
    Young does ASCR.
    [I]I do not tear down CRPA, I ONLY make peopl

  2. #2
    Aww... I feel bad for him....NOT.
    1FineSpineRN

  3. #3
    Senior Member KIM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Piedralaves (Avila) SPAIN
    Posts
    1,015
    OLEEEE DENVER!

  4. #4
    REVOLUTION! Death to the present GOP!


Similar Threads

  1. Bush threatens to use veto against any attempt to roll back Medicare prescription plan
    By Wise Young in forum Funding, Legislation, & Advocacy
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-13-2005, 09:03 PM
  2. state of the union picture
    By kort in forum Life
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 02-03-2003, 06:08 PM
  3. TIME MAGAZINE
    By Birde in forum Cure
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-15-2001, 12:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •