Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Electrical stimulation gives hope to paralyzed

  1. #1
    Senior Member KIM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Piedralaves (Avila) SPAIN
    Posts
    1,015

    Electrical stimulation gives hope to paralyzed

    Updated: 5:50 p.m. ET Jan. 30, 2006

    Vibrating tingles of electricity worm into the thin legs of paralyzed children, pulling at their muscles to pump up and down on a special bicycle.

    It’s called electrical stimulation exercise therapy, and small but tantalizing studies suggest that this intense rehab just might help restore some function to people with spinal cord injuries, even if they were paralyzed long ago.

    Desperate patients have sought this therapy since it was credited with helping the late Christopher Reeve regain the ability to feel human touch and move just a little, more than five years after a riding accident completely paralyzed the “Superman” star. Now scientists are putting the approach to a rigorous test — in a study with children that may begin to answer whether this sweat equity truly fuels recovery.
    Story continues below ↓ advertisement

    Patients “will do anything for a glimmer of hope,” cautions Dr. Randal Betz of Philadelphia’s Shriners Hospital for Children, which has a waiting list of 5- to 13-year-olds hoping to enter the study. “What’s appealing about the cycling is it’s not surgery, it’s not hurtful. ... Everybody is hopeful that it will also show improvement in neurologic function.”

    The idea: Remaining nerves in the spine may be dormant, partially recovered after the injury but essentially asleep as the brain can no longer send “get moving” messages down to them. Using electricity to stimulate those nerves and cause certain patterns of motion may teach them to carry signals locally, maybe even route new connections around the injury.

    It’s controversial. Doctors have long thought that if the body repairs itself after a spinal cord injury — which does sometimes happen — any improvement will occur in the first six months, and that there’s no hope for further recovery beyond about 18 months. The paralysis sparks a slide into declining health from inactivity: infections, thinning and breaking bones, heart disease as muscles wither and fat accumulates.

    “We have to maintain the nervous system,” contends Dr. John W. McDonald of Baltimore’s Kennedy Krieger Institute, Reeve’s former doctor and the exercise therapy’s leading proponent. “Adding activity can optimize regeneration. What’s good activity? We don’t know yet.”

    But he’s sending patients home, 200 so far, with special exercise bicycles hooked up to functional electrical stimulation, or FES, systems — sticky pads that deliver little electrical jolts to muscles through the skin, stimulating their legs to push the pedals. He’s persuading insurance companies to pay for the $15,000 bikes by arguing that, if nothing else, this aerobic-style, muscle-resistant exercise should lower medical bills by keeping the paralyzed generally healthier.

    McDonald compared 48 paralyzed adults, half who pedaled an FES bike for at least three hours a week and half who had no special care. The exercise patients increased muscle strength, melted fat, and cut a complication called spasticity, uncontrollable jerks that limit the recovery of those with some movement, he told a neurology meeting last fall.

    “These benefits are so big that if that was all they got, it was good enough to do this,” McDonald says.

    But 40 percent of the exercise group also regained some motor function over three years compared with 4 percent of the “control” patients. It was modest but important improvement: some regained bladder control; some regained useful hand function; some moved from “prewalking,” moving their legs while being held up, to taking a few steps.

    ‘Incomplete story’
    While McDonald says about 70 rehabilitation centers have adopted FES cycling therapy since a medical journal published his report on Reeve in 2002, other specialists warn that individual successes don’t prove recovery is due to a therapy instead of the body’s slow healing over time.

    “What we have at the moment is an incomplete story that is based upon ... very little data,” cautions Dr. Mark S. Nash of the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis.

    Hence the Shriners study. Although small, with 30 patients, it is the first stringent comparison of FES cycling with passive exercise — someone moving their limbs — or electrical stimulation alone. Early results are expected in a year.

    McDonald notes that children in general recover from neural injuries better than adults, and points to remarkable progress by one of his own patients, 15-year-old Loretta McRae.

    Paralyzed from the shoulders down after a diving accident in Australia a year ago, Loretta since November has exercised five days a week on the FES bike and with a similar electrical stimulator strapped to her wrists. She now can walk several wobbly feet with a cane, and last week took a few tentative but jubilant steps unassisted. She can go to the bathroom alone. Her hands are unfreezing.

    Would Loretta have recovered this much anyway? There’s no way to tell, although early return of sensation was a good sign.

    But she’s not done: “I want to run, and I want to dance.”

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11103352/from/RSS/

  2. #2
    Thanx for this post...

    My neurologist seems to think electrical stimulation is pointless and can actually be damaging by preventing neural regeneration. I have always disagreed with him and glad that some kind of study has finally been done about it's value.

    Cheers
    Christopher

  3. #3
    Senior Member Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Montreal,Province of Quebec, CANADA
    Posts
    15,036

    Arrow Same topic-other recearch & article

    Zapping muscles to restore tired tissues
    U of A researcher hopes to treat spinal cord injuries with electrical stimulation

    Rachel Hendricks

    New and innovative research from the U of A’s Human Neurophysiology Lab is focused on the workings of the nervous system, but it’s also suggesting some promising applications for treating spinal cord injuries.

    Dr Dave Collins, an Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Scholar at the U of A, is currently proposing a more natural way of electrically stimulating disused muscles. According to Collins, the research could eventually pave the way to restoring mobility in people with spinal cord injuries, but the initial step is to tackle a very present danger for inactive individuals: muscle atrophy.

    Muscle atrophy is the wasting of muscle tissue, often caused by disuse, and is markedly linked with heart problems. People who have experienced muscle loss due to a stroke, a broken limb, being encased in a cast for a long period of time or even space flight may develop muscle atrophy. These individuals are also likely to benefit from Collins’ research, but his focus is on those with spinal cord injuries.

    “One of the main problems after a spinal cord injury is that people die from cardiovascular disease because they’re basically the most sedentary group in the world,” explained Collins.

    Electrical stimulation has been used to treat this condition in the past, but Collins’ approach differs in important ways. The typical method has been to directly stimulate the muscle through electrodes, whereas Collins’ method includes the use of reflex pathways.

    http://www.gateway.ualberta.ca/view.php?aid=5484

  4. #4
    I always heard doctors saying that electrostimulation is bad for SCI people. Mmmmmm, interesting.
    Anyone know what type of stim is they are using?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by KIM
    Updated: 5:50 p.m. ET Jan. 30, 2006

    Vibrating tingles of electricity worm into the thin legs of paralyzed children, pulling at their muscles to pump up and down on a special bicycle.

    It’s called electrical stimulation exercise therapy, and small but tantalizing studies suggest that this intense rehab just might help restore some function to people with spinal cord injuries, even if they were paralyzed long ago.

    Desperate patients have sought this therapy since it was credited with helping the late Christopher Reeve regain the ability to feel human touch and move just a little, more than five years after a riding accident completely paralyzed the “Superman” star. Now scientists are putting the approach to a rigorous test — in a study with children that may begin to answer whether this sweat equity truly fuels recovery.
    Story continues below ↓ advertisement

    Patients “will do anything for a glimmer of hope,” cautions Dr. Randal Betz of Philadelphia’s Shriners Hospital for Children, which has a waiting list of 5- to 13-year-olds hoping to enter the study. “What’s appealing about the cycling is it’s not surgery, it’s not hurtful. ... Everybody is hopeful that it will also show improvement in neurologic function.”

    The idea: Remaining nerves in the spine may be dormant, partially recovered after the injury but essentially asleep as the brain can no longer send “get moving” messages down to them. Using electricity to stimulate those nerves and cause certain patterns of motion may teach them to carry signals locally, maybe even route new connections around the injury.

    It’s controversial. Doctors have long thought that if the body repairs itself after a spinal cord injury — which does sometimes happen — any improvement will occur in the first six months, and that there’s no hope for further recovery beyond about 18 months. The paralysis sparks a slide into declining health from inactivity: infections, thinning and breaking bones, heart disease as muscles wither and fat accumulates.

    “We have to maintain the nervous system,” contends Dr. John W. McDonald of Baltimore’s Kennedy Krieger Institute, Reeve’s former doctor and the exercise therapy’s leading proponent. “Adding activity can optimize regeneration. What’s good activity? We don’t know yet.”

    But he’s sending patients home, 200 so far, with special exercise bicycles hooked up to functional electrical stimulation, or FES, systems — sticky pads that deliver little electrical jolts to muscles through the skin, stimulating their legs to push the pedals. He’s persuading insurance companies to pay for the $15,000 bikes by arguing that, if nothing else, this aerobic-style, muscle-resistant exercise should lower medical bills by keeping the paralyzed generally healthier.

    McDonald compared 48 paralyzed adults, half who pedaled an FES bike for at least three hours a week and half who had no special care. The exercise patients increased muscle strength, melted fat, and cut a complication called spasticity, uncontrollable jerks that limit the recovery of those with some movement, he told a neurology meeting last fall.

    “These benefits are so big that if that was all they got, it was good enough to do this,” McDonald says.

    But 40 percent of the exercise group also regained some motor function over three years compared with 4 percent of the “control” patients. It was modest but important improvement: some regained bladder control; some regained useful hand function; some moved from “prewalking,” moving their legs while being held up, to taking a few steps.

    ‘Incomplete story’
    While McDonald says about 70 rehabilitation centers have adopted FES cycling therapy since a medical journal published his report on Reeve in 2002, other specialists warn that individual successes don’t prove recovery is due to a therapy instead of the body’s slow healing over time.

    “What we have at the moment is an incomplete story that is based upon ... very little data,” cautions Dr. Mark S. Nash of the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis.

    Hence the Shriners study. Although small, with 30 patients, it is the first stringent comparison of FES cycling with passive exercise — someone moving their limbs — or electrical stimulation alone. Early results are expected in a year.

    McDonald notes that children in general recover from neural injuries better than adults, and points to remarkable progress by one of his own patients, 15-year-old Loretta McRae.

    Paralyzed from the shoulders down after a diving accident in Australia a year ago, Loretta since November has exercised five days a week on the FES bike and with a similar electrical stimulator strapped to her wrists. She now can walk several wobbly feet with a cane, and last week took a few tentative but jubilant steps unassisted. She can go to the bathroom alone. Her hands are unfreezing.

    Would Loretta have recovered this much anyway? There’s no way to tell, although early return of sensation was a good sign.

    But she’s not done: “I want to run, and I want to dance.”

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11103352/from/RSS/
    Thanks Max,
    Dr. McDonald, Dr. Sadowsky and Pat Rummerfield located at Kennedy Krieger’s new International Center for Spinal Cord Injury are the three musketeers of SCI research and rehab. With this new info I’m getting on the schedule to be seen at KKI SCI center and ordering a RT 300.
    Ross

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Isildur
    I always heard doctors saying that electrostimulation is bad for SCI people. Mmmmmm, interesting.
    Anyone know what type of stim is they are using?
    Go to the EMPI website, FES on SCI has shown positive results for a number of years.
    Ross

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Isildur
    I always heard doctors saying that electrostimulation is bad for SCI people. Mmmmmm, interesting.
    Anyone know what type of stim is they are using?
    Are there any studies outlining dangers of e-stim for people with SCI? Are there instances where e-stim is contraindicated?
    Daniel

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Ross1
    Thanks Max,
    Dr. McDonald, Dr. Sadowsky and Pat Rummerfield located at Kennedy Krieger’s new International Center for Spinal Cord Injury are the three musketeers of SCI research and rehab. With this new info I’m getting on the schedule to be seen at KKI SCI center and ordering a RT 300.
    Ross
    Ross,

    Have you done FES before? What were some of the positive outcomes? Do you have any voluntary movement in your lower extremities?
    Daniel

  9. #9
    FES=TENS?
    Are the same, or tens isn´t effective?

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_nc
    Ross,

    Have you done FES before? What were some of the positive outcomes? Do you have any voluntary movement in your lower extremities?
    I went on the old FES bike last summer. It was great to pedal the bike and watch my quads contract, I only lasted 1.6 min the first time and three min the second time. I could feel my heart hate go up it was stimulating.
    No voluntary movement in the lower extremities, not much below C-5.
    I believe this new FES RT 300 will turn out to be a piece of the puzzle.
    Ross

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-21-2011, 02:18 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-07-2005, 03:03 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-17-2004, 10:24 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-27-2001, 12:21 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-25-2001, 04:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •