Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: All or Nothing?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member lynnifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Windsor ON Canada
    Posts
    19,320

    Question All or Nothing?

    Bear with me because it's another 'what if question' ... I'm just curious.

    *****
    If you could have your bladder back in 5 or less years, but it would exclude you from a complete cure in 20 ... would you do it and why?
    *****

    I only would because I'm 33 ... keeping in mind my bone density, pressure sores on feet, AGE and atrophied muscle ... I'd rather have my bladder back. Having bladder back would mean no more UTI's, no risk for sepsis, no AD or pain and total control with no accidents.

    If I waited 20 years, I'd be 53 .. I'm not sure I'd still be around by then and even if I were, my shoulders would be pained and not totally up to walking parallel bars or going through any intensive rehab. I already have the joints of an 80yr old according to the last Nuc Med tech I saw .. lol.

    Your answer and reasoning please with your age and length of paralysis ...

    T12 for 20 years
    Roses are red. Tacos are enjoyable. Don't blame immigrants, because you're unemployable.

    T-11 Flaccid Paraplegic due to TM July 1985 @ age 12

  2. #2
    Wouldn't take bladder in five years - I cath, never void and rarely get utis - but as a quad I would take full restoration of hands/arms in five years over a full cure in 20.

    Have to say I have no pain and no major bowel issues. If I did I might think differently

    C5/6 inc - injured almost 1 year
    C5/6 incomplete

    "I assume you all have guns and crack....."

  3. #3
    Senior Member martha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Texas hallelujah!
    Posts
    1,077
    I know my husband would have taken the bladder control over the total cure. He had too many UTI's and sepsis was the, or at least a contributing, factor in his death. And at his age at injury (51) a cure in 20 years wouldn't have been any help to him though he certainly would have wanted it for everyone else!

  4. #4
    Senior Member Zeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    3,432
    Lynnifer,

    No I wouldn't. I'm C5/C6 complete since age 7, and I'm almost 31 now. My bladder has been good to me I guess. I had a condom cath for 22 years, and that was a drag. Always coming off, constant sores on my penis from the irritation, and ultimately the stretching of my bladder to giant size. Still, I only averaged one uti every 3-4 years, until the bladder stretching. Now I have a sp cath, and I'm in urinary tract nirvana (for a quad!). Some people hate leg-bags. I've had them my whole life practically, so they don't bother me much.

    Now, as for RehabRhino's suggestion, full arm/hand movement in 5 years vs cure in 20 years. Arm/hand function in 5 years is the winner by a landslide. Even if I had to give every adult male in Canada a bj as part of the arm/hand function therapy, I'd still choose that over a no-strings-attached cure in 20 years. Yes, I am being deadly serious this time.

    Just to clarify, I'm a staunch heterosexual.

    Chris.
    Last edited by Zeus; 11-19-2005 at 10:48 AM.
    Have you ever seen a human heart? It looks like a fist wrapped in blood! Larry in 'Closer', a play by Partick Marber

  5. #5
    I'd rather be able to poop.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by cspanos
    Now, as for RehabRhino's suggestion, full arm/hand movement in 5 years vs cure in 20 years. Arm/hand function in 5 years is the winner by a landslide. Even if I had to give every adult male in Canada a bj as part of the arm/hand function therapy, I'd still choose that over a no-strings-attached cure in 20 years. Yes, I am being deadly serious this time.

    Just to clarify, I'm a staunch heterosexual.

    Chris.
    lmao chris...

  7. #7
    i'm with Rehab and Jayday on this..... i'd sit forever just to have my hands back...





    Life isn't like a bowl of cherries or peaches. It's more like a jar of jalapenos--What you do today might burn your ass tomorrow.

    If you ain't laughing, you ain't living, baby. Carlos Mencia

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by RehabRhino
    Wouldn't take bladder in five years - I cath, never void and rarely get utis - but as a quad I would take full restoration of hands/arms in five years over a full cure in 20.

    Have to say I have no pain and no major bowel issues. If I did I might think differently

    C5/6 inc - injured almost 1 year
    DING DING DING...

  9. #9
    Senior Member abrooks311's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs,AR, USA
    Posts
    727
    yep I agree...as a quad I'd def like to have my arms/hands/fingers
    Blah

  10. #10
    No way. I've been injured for two days shy of one year now, and wouldn't trade any fraction of a cure in the near future for a guaranteed full recovery sometime down the road, so long as it would happen before old age incapacitates me anyways! I void straining though, and don't have to cath or deal with UTI's, so that's not such a huge issue for me.

    I remember in the hospital people told me that SCIers would typically take their bladder control back before their ability to walk, and I still can't believe that. I'd trade my functional bladder for the ability to walk right now if I could. Pass me the caths, so long as I can use them while standing!
    I have met the dragon. . .

    www.micksluck.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •