View Poll Results:

Voters
120. You may not vote on this poll
  • I am not interested

    2 1.67%
  • I would try it only if it is for free (insurance-covered)

    10 8.33%
  • I would try even if I had to pay $1000

    63 52.50%
  • I would try even if I had to pay $10000

    22 18.33%
  • I would try regardless of cost.

    23 19.17%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Interest in intensive exercises (FES bike, treadmill locomotor training)

  1. #1

    Interest in intensive exercises (FES bike, treadmill locomotor training)

    Seneca and I was recently discussing with a well-known and experienced clinician who indicated to us that he was not sure that there is a big market for exercise devices. He recounted his experience with the Ergys bike and how, even when they provided the bike at low cost ($25), to people with spinal cord injury in the 1980's, few people took advantage of it. He suggests that if such devices were made available in the major rehabilitation centers, there would be few people who would be interested enough to warrant the expense and effort. So, if there were a well-designed home device that could do walking exercises... what would your reaction be?

    [This message was edited by Wise Young on Nov 02, 2002 at 06:00 PM.]

  2. #2

    No cynicism allowed :)

    Dr. Young, that clinician also believed that what SCI's say they would do and what they are actually willing to do are two separate issues. It was my opinion that the desire and motivation to improve regardless of the hassle or cost is there. If the entire community was truly apathetic, Drs. like Koa wouldn't be making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Places like Project Walk wouldn't be successful, there would be little or no interest in the treatments offered by the Chinese and Russians and the OEG/C researchers certainly wouldn't be overwhelmed by requests by SCI's from all over the world to enter their trials. I think it's important that we not make generalizations about what the entire SCI population is willing to do to get better based on a small sample from a limited geographical area.

  3. #3
    Seneca, I was taken aback by his suggestion that there would be little interest. I agree with you that there are two problems with this poll. First, people may say that they are interested but don't really do it. They may have the greatest intentions but when it comes time to put up the money and the time, they don't do it. Second, our community may attract people who are particularly motivated and may not be representative of the more general community. Wise.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Rick1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Carlsbad, CA
    Posts
    724
    Therein lies a big part of the problem - that "a well-known and experienced clinician" could have such a myopic viewpoint.

    I think some simple market research (focus groups) on the subject would yield encouraging enough results; and followed by an education / awareness campaign, the results would be far more conclusive.

    If we passively wait for "clinicians" to deliver the best therapy, we'll die of frustration. The key, in my opinion, is a "bottom up" campaign, led by those with the most at stake (guess who). Individual efforts, like those of many on these forums, and a growing "demand" for a more aggressive, performance based therapy, will ultimately lead to a "critical mass, " and a more positive mainstream approach to recovery.

    Unfortunately, the ones with the most leverage are also the least informed and most naïve. The newly injured are a virtual "gravy train" for treatment centers. If they could be adequately informed and given a strong voice at the early stages of treatment, it would have a profound effect on the status quo.

  5. #5
    Senior Member ~Patrick~'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Lewistown,Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,517
    so many of us have gone from being successful normal families to depending on SS income and family help. Spending money has become a thought out process that some of us find difficult. To spend $1000 on a piece of exercise equipment would be a huge investment for me. What I am trying to say is its not that we are not interested its just not practical for most of us.

    ...act like a survivor not a victim.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Rick1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Carlsbad, CA
    Posts
    724

    Sub-Poll

    If I had been well informed, and offered real choices at the time of my initial rehab - when my insurance was willing to lay out for services, unquestioningly - I would have chosen:

    A. standard sit and transfer program

    B. activity based program that would enhance my potential for recovery and provide a platform for long term health and performance.

  7. #7
    Dr. Young,

    You mentioned this clinician experienced apathy back in the 80's. Isn't it true that we are just now realizing what excercise and intensive rehab can do to regain function. Also, it seems to me that rehab facilities still don't promote excercise as a possible aid in regaining function. They seem to still have the mindset that you should just accept your level of injury and learn to deal with it. If TIRR had told me the benefits of gait training back in 2000 I would have immediately bought or built a gait training system and not waited until this year.

    Deb

  8. #8
    Senior Member Jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Argao, Cebu, Philippines
    Posts
    6,864

    I agree, Debbie

    I think all the recent exposure has begun a shift in people's thinking about exercise.

    The other thing is that with all the advances in bladder management, kidney problems will no longer be far and away the leading cause of early death for us. Living longer means that cardiovascular fitness will become more and more important. I also think that more insurances will wake up to the cost savings of FES. Preventing one bad pressure sore can pay for a FES bike.

    ~See you at the SCIWire-used-to-be-paralyzed Reunion ~

  9. #9
    Rick, Debbie, Seneca, Wheel, Jeff - very well said, great points.

    Wise, its got to be top down leadership and a bottom up effort. The doctors have to promote it and then the insurance will pay for it. On the opposite side the "mavericks" like me and a few others have to drive it from the bottom up. Hopefully we'll meet in the middle in the not too distant future.

    Overall, there has to be a psychological shift. Most importantly from the docs, medical, rehab community.

    Reading and sensing a few of your recent posts Wise it might behoove you to visit Project Walk or Dr. McDonald's program? I'm not sure that you're totally on board with this exercise towards recovery concept?

    Hopefully the UMI and Wayne State University studies now ongoing at PW will prove the validity of exercise/rehab recovery.

    Doctors are funny. They say to me "we're not sure about this, we need proof". I say give me the money, I'll show you the proof" They say "we can't afford for you to prove it but we think it may be plausible". It's like which came first the chicken or the egg?

    Sheesh.

    Onward and Upward!

  10. #10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •