Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: I don't understand it.

  1. #1

    I don't understand it.

    “Arise and Walk!” – A Miracle Cure in the Works.

    “Arise, take up thy bed,” Christ commanded a paralyzed man, according to the Gospel of Matthew. The man “arose and departed.” Healing a paralytic is miraculous… But it may soon become an everyday miracle of science, rather than a rare miracle of faith.
    In April 2011, the Washington Post reported that the first patient to receive a human embryonic stem-cell treatment for paralysis from a spinal-cord injury had regained some feeling in his legs.
    Timothy Atchinson, a 21-year-old nursing student in Alabama, was paralyzed from the waist down in a car accident in September 2010. He quickly accepted an offer to be the initial participant in the world’s first clinical trial using human embryonic stem cells. Now after months of not feeling or not being able to move his body below his chest, Atchison claimed he had begun to get some very slight sensation: He could feel relief when he lifted a bowling ball off his lap and discern discomfort when he pulled on hairs on some parts of his legs. He had also strengthened his abdomen.
    This miraculous medical breakthrough was fascinating to me, not simply because the story itself is amazing, but also because I witnessed the genesis of the research that made it possible.
    The treatment emerged from the laboratory of Hans Keirstead, a neurobiologist with the Sue & Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center at UC Irvine. While Dr. Keirstead was busy making his groundbreaking discovery in his lab, I was conducting a completely different sort of stem cell research in a nearby lab at UCI.
    UCI has a robust stem cell research program that has received more than $52 million from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. A four-story building dedicated to stem cell research broke ground in 2010. It houses the stem cell center, dozens of laboratory-based and clinical researchers, a stem cell techniques course, a master’s program in biotechnology with an emphasis on stem cell research, and programs and activities for patients and public education.
    Neurobiologist Hans Keirstead was very well-known and respected at UCI, even before his groundbreaking research project. He had been trying for years to find a way to use human embryonic stem cells to restore movement in people who have suffered spinal injuries. In 2005, he published a cutting-edge report in the Journal of Neuroscience entitled “Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants remyelinate and restore locomotion after spinal cord injury.”
    In other words, he enabled paralyzed rats to walk again.
    The therapy he developed utilizes embryonic stem cells destined to become spinal cord cells called oligodendrocytes. These are the building blocks of myelin, the biological insulation for nerve fibers that is critical for maintaining electrical conduction in the central nervous system. When myelin is stripped away, through injury or disease, paralysis can occur.
    The study showed that a week after test rats with 100 percent walking ability suffered neck spinal cord injuries, some received the stem cell treatment. The walking ability of those that didn’t get the treatment degraded to 38 percent. The walking ability of the treated rats, however, was restored to 97 percent.
    When I started to work at UCI, two years after Keirstead published his initial findings, his research had advanced significantly. He had shown, for example, that the therapy using human embryonic stem cells was not harmful to the rats, and he was reviewing the practical considerations and risks that must be addressed before human treatments could begin.
    By the summer of 2010, the FDA approved the Embryonic Stem Cell-Based Therapy For Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury. This trial started in Oct 2010…
    … And so did the controversy.
    Most of us at UCI were intrigued by Keirstead’s research…especially when it progressed from rats to humans. At that moment, the buzz among us was, “They’re going to try it on humans! Can you believe it?” But in the broader scientific community, many folks were dubious and dismissive, if not completely alarmed.
    Arthur Caplan, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania and a defender of stem-cell therapies famously bashed the trial saying that it was poorly designed. “This is nuts and hugely risky,” says Caplan. “The animal studies are not adequate to justify the trial. Those studies provide too little proof of safety and Keirstead’s original findings in rats offer thin evidence that people will be helped.”
    One year into trial, however, none of the 10 patients have experienced any adverse reactions from the treatment, although a few “mild” adverse reactions were reported from a drug used to suppress the patients’ immune responses.
    Keirstead has said the initial reports from the paralyzed Timothy Atchinson are exciting, but anecdotal and not scientifically verified. The formal outcome of this trial won’t be known until two years after the last of the ten patients receives the therapy.
    Meanwhile, other trials are ongoing using adult-induced pluripotent stem cells to repair spinal cord injuries, rather than embryonic stem cells. No matter the ultimate results of these particular stem cell trials, stem cell therapies are on the threshold of making truly miraculous cures an everyday event.
    Regards,
    Severine Kirchner, PhD.

    Business Insider


    Have you a good life.

  2. #2
    Senior Member 0xSquidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Barcelona (Spain)
    Posts
    1,072
    I couldn't read passed the first 3 lines. My brain fell out, i'm trying to find it on the floor.
    Don't ask what clinical trials can do for you, ask what you can do for clinical trials.

    Fenexy: Proyecto Volver a Caminar

    http://www.fenexy.org (soon in english too)

  3. #3
    Very promising research and the institution is very credible.
    Disclaimer: Answers, suggestions, and/or comments do not constitute medical advice expressed or implied. Please consult your attending physician for medical advise and treatment. In the event of a medical emergency please call 911.

  4. #4
    Its so miraculous that the most hyped SCI trial ever was abandoned prior stage one
    So here we go yet again with words like he claimed,
    All in all this report does say

    its anecdotal and not scientifically verified

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by russianrob View Post
    Very promising research and the institution is very credible.
    I know see Dr Kierstadt in the same boat as Dr. Tuszynski, Dr. Davies, Miami Project, and few others with what seems very narrow vision. These dinosaurs are still working on the same work they started 5 yrs ago. Its there research and the hell with anything else that may be better. I bet all this people would scuff at the notion of using UCSC, MSC or chase. We are very fortunate to have research scientists like Dr. Young and Dr. Silver.
    "I'm manic as hell-
    But I'm goin' strong-
    Left my meds on the sink again-
    My head will be racing by lunchtime"

    <----Scott Weiland---->

  6. #6
    I m sure Dr Kierstadt was given a good deal by Geron.

  7. #7
    Dr silver commented last year on the Geron trial and Kiersted. Silver said that in the experts view, the hypothesis that were made on goeron's trial were negative through out the community. since the Geron pullout, I haven't heard much from Kiersted. right now we have things that are happening now and maybe soon to happen. wise Young is conductung his monthly meeting at Rutgers June 1st. He weill give an update of his trial via webcast. All I can say is that let's hope for good clear news.

    anthony

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Murrieta, Ca.
    Posts
    424
    You guys need to give Hans Keirstead a little more credit. He's very committed to finding a fix for chronic spinal cord injury and is working as diligently as he ever has towards that goal.

    I spoke to him a month ago via email, and he still believes hESC's are an important part of a cure and is working to over come the hurdles associated with them.

    Yeah the stopping of the Geron trial was a bummer for all of us but it's still useful. It's hopefully going to prove out the safety of hECS's and that they are well tolerated in humans. That step had to happen and it has.

    As much as I believe in the work that Dr. Young and Dr. Silver are doing I feel it's important to have researchers looking in lots of different areas for a cure as none of the research studies so far are a sure fire answer. Dr Tuszynski has been doing primate studies for sometime and that should come in useful in the future also.

Similar Threads

  1. Maybe I just don't understand...
    By ForMyCousin in forum Exercise & Recovery
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 09-22-2011, 06:28 PM
  2. Do not understand this!!
    By cathy j in forum Care
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-10-2010, 03:24 PM
  3. help to understand
    By tricie76 in forum New SCI
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-11-2004, 05:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •