Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The chickens are roosting...paid caregivers in the UK

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    537

    The chickens are roosting...paid caregivers in the UK




    At last we are seeing the fruits of cost slashing in community care. (Another rant brewing)! This is a care issue; we are after all not solely about cure on the forum.


    In the UK, publically funded care provision is, at least in the South West, being abolished. The idea is that private companies (rackets?) will take up the reins. Our carers currently work out at about £100 p. c. month. They are excellent, but the only reason we still have them is because we do pay. Those who rely on Social Services have been given the elbow, and it is only a matter of time before we also lose their services. In the meanwhile, their hours have been cut hugely, directly affecting their earnings, which were not spectacular before! A very worrying time for them, and their clients.


    The opposition will not charge by the quarter hour, the quantum being half an hour – (how long before the hour we ask?) They also charge more, with the possibility that our costs could rise to £300, for the princely attention all week of 1.75hrs. That is not all.


    One private carer has provided a client with six totally different visitors in a week, and the wife of the client found one individual having a lounge on the sofa playing games on a mobile phone. In another instance, in three weeks a client had just three visits, with no explanation or warning whatsoever.


    One of our carers went over to a “rapid response” unit, and this is run from a hub in Exeter. His day starts with a trip there, 20 miles+ each way, just to find out who he has to visit. At the end of the day, he has to repeat the whole insane process to provide feedback! I wonder who pays the £1.40 per litre for the fuel? I wonder how they can justify wasting at least 1.5 hours of his time in needless commutation?


    I mentioned to the nurse that expendable items ought not to be wasted, (rather as a tease) and she said that a packet of “inco pads” costs £60. I said this was a rip off, and she said she quite agreed. (A slide sheet, - not full length – casts £70). Where the hell do they get these prices? Yes anything that is medical carries a price tag way beyond that necessary, and the very people supposed to be “helped”, or the NHS, are ripped off unmercifully. It's the same with pharmaceuticals. When a local Boot's rep made a routine call to see me, she said that they were running a month's holiday trial, where a patients withdrew from taking medication, that was not obviously vital, with the GP's or consultant's permission. The number of patients taking costly, (with potentially harmful side effects), that they simply do not need is a matter of concern.


    It's one thing to rant about research for cure, which is not simply a cost issue on account of the huge technical problems, but another to insist, rightly that what clearly is well within technical possibilities is done correctly and efficiently. The question that must hang in the air about the quality of what is dished out, is are the instigators 24 caret cretins, or are they criminals, or maybe both? Not much cause for comfort either way.
    2010 SCINet Clinical Trial Support Squad Member
    Please join me and donate a dollar a day at http://justadollarplease.org and copy and paste this message to the bottom of your signature.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Timaru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hampshire, England.
    Posts
    5,004
    Do you mean that the Direct Payments Scheme has been abolished in the South West?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    537
    Quote Originally Posted by Timaru View Post
    Do you mean that the Direct Payments Scheme has been abolished in the South West?
    Not sure about this. The actual carers we use, provided by social services are being phased out. Basically to get care, private providers are what are left, and these are 1 expensive, 2 apparently unreliable.

    Of course DLA is still provided and has actually been marginally increased.
    2010 SCINet Clinical Trial Support Squad Member
    Please join me and donate a dollar a day at http://justadollarplease.org and copy and paste this message to the bottom of your signature.

  4. #4
    Like Timaru, I'm still a little confused.

    Are you having to pay privately out of your own pocket or do you mean the local authority has contracted care services out to a private company?
    C5/6 incomplete

    "I assume you all have guns and crack....."

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    537
    Quote Originally Posted by RehabRhino View Post
    Like Timaru, I'm still a little confused.

    Are you having to pay privately out of your own pocket or do you mean the local authority has contracted care services out to a private company?
    That's quite correct. I know that the DLA is payed to help defray the costs incurred by disability, and I am not sure how those who still find care costs a burden are supposed to manage. I am fortunate in having additionally to the State Pension, two good occupational pensions.

    Having said that, I think that those less fortunate are faced with a very real problem. They pay, (a greatly increased cost for a much poorer service) or go without.

    I do not object in the least to what we pay currently, and as far as I can see this is not subsidised, nor would it be reasonable to expect this help. Surely I can not be the only one to feel disgusted by the absurd cost of many of the consumables that disabled have to use.

    We had recent experience of transport hire to the hospital, using a private ambulance. It was a nightmare. We waited for hours, the driver had no local "knowledge", and their attitude left something to be desired, in total contrast to the NHS standard vehicle outward. So, both were payed for by the NHS, but there would be no prizes for guessing the most expensive service.
    2010 SCINet Clinical Trial Support Squad Member
    Please join me and donate a dollar a day at http://justadollarplease.org and copy and paste this message to the bottom of your signature.

  6. #6
    It's very inconsistent throughout the UK as well. In Cheshire I paid nothing towards care, moved to Manchester and paid £35 a month, then re-assessed and paid £17, then re-assessed and paid zero, now they tell me I need to contribute again.

    I never objected the first time and they've never given me any criteria as to why the figures changed either way.

    The small amount of care I do receive is sub-contracted to a private company and, 80 per cent of the time they are ok but this is often down to getting cetain individuals rather than any company ethos or service. They treat their staff shockingly.
    C5/6 incomplete

    "I assume you all have guns and crack....."

Similar Threads

  1. Backyard chickens
    By DaleB in forum Life
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-11-2008, 10:28 PM
  2. Ruling by Supreme Court for caregivers(paid)
    By Raven in forum Caregiving
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-13-2007, 09:50 PM
  3. Wages paid to caregivers?
    By Valeen in forum Caregiving
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-31-2003, 06:07 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-28-2003, 09:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •