View RSS Feed

webfoot

Communication is so important . . . (TiLite TR design)

Rate this Entry
Quote Originally Posted by chasmengr View Post
Quote Originally Posted by nonoise View Post
I don't see where you specified COG, but TiLite returned with one of them at -1.25. Is that what you want?

Edit: The cad seems wrong as dimensioned. Shouldn't it be -1.25/2?, 3/4 inch since the line only goes to the center of the camber tube which is 1.25 inches in diameter.
I guessed at the dimensions of the cambertube mounts, so you're correct, I did not spec CoG other than "H=MIN." I'm trusting TiLite's dimensions around those mounts.

Yes, -1.25 is great for the aft cambertube (Dragonfly traction). I'm ever so slightly nervous about a 4" minimum CoG for the forward cambertube; my current AeroZ CoG is about 2.25", but the TR is said to be more front heavy (needs a more forward CoG than AeroZ), and my PT said my shoulders will benefit from a more forward CoG.

edit: -1.25 is dependent on dimensions of the amputee adapter, and is measured from front of backrest cane to center of aft cambertube.

Name:  TiLite AmpAdpt.JPG
Views: 54
Size:  62.8 KB
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments