daveh0
09-01-2007, 07:55 PM
Ok. My install of XP is pretty hosed so I'm going to bite the bullet and re-install from scratch. As long as I'm doing this, I want to optimize my system for best performance as I rebuild.
Here's what I've got:
- p4 3.2GHz processor with 3Gb RAM
- C: 160gb 7200rpm SATA HD
- D: 80gb 7200rpm ATA HD (using a SATA adapter)
- E: (just bought - not installed yet) 500 gb 7200rpm external USB 2.0 HD
A typical session for me involves opening several larger applications at the same time and switching between them frequently (ex. Outlook, Photoshop, Illustrator and Flash... in addition to a few web browser windows, maybe Word and an IM client).
My system's performance has been OK but with all that RAM, I fel like it could/should be a lot better. I've been reading some and here's what I'm thinking of doing.
1. Install OS and applications on unpartitioned 160gb HD (C:)
2. Partition the 80gb HD into D: and E:. with the D: partition being be used strictly for Windows page file. The E: partition for 'data' (i.e. the files that I create and edit in all these applications)
3. Partition the 500gb drive into F: G: and H:. F: will be used strictly for Photoshop's Scratch Disk (similar to Windows Page File). G: will be used for 'other' files like music, photos, etc. and H: will be a rather large partition where I back-up ALL data from ALL machines on my LAN (also running an Ubuntu box as a web and mail server, an OS X box just for fun and my g/f's laptop)
I'm still uncertain about a few things:
will partitioning my 500gb drive increase the likelihood of having issues thus defeating the purpose of it being my backup?
Is an external USB drive going to be too slow to be my primary Scratch Disk for Photoshop - am I better off keeping the Windows Page file on the same drive as Windows (C:) and using the D: partition of the 80gb HD for Photoshop's scratch disk?
One other variation that I can throw in the mix would be to install an old 10gb SCSI drive I have laying around. This could be used for a Scratch Disk or Page file. But is using an old (probably slower than USB) dedicated drive for 1 of these purposes worse than using a partition of a newer drive?
Sorry for the long post. If anyone was able to follow my ramble and has some wistom to share, I'd be most appreciative.
Thanks,
-dave
Here's what I've got:
- p4 3.2GHz processor with 3Gb RAM
- C: 160gb 7200rpm SATA HD
- D: 80gb 7200rpm ATA HD (using a SATA adapter)
- E: (just bought - not installed yet) 500 gb 7200rpm external USB 2.0 HD
A typical session for me involves opening several larger applications at the same time and switching between them frequently (ex. Outlook, Photoshop, Illustrator and Flash... in addition to a few web browser windows, maybe Word and an IM client).
My system's performance has been OK but with all that RAM, I fel like it could/should be a lot better. I've been reading some and here's what I'm thinking of doing.
1. Install OS and applications on unpartitioned 160gb HD (C:)
2. Partition the 80gb HD into D: and E:. with the D: partition being be used strictly for Windows page file. The E: partition for 'data' (i.e. the files that I create and edit in all these applications)
3. Partition the 500gb drive into F: G: and H:. F: will be used strictly for Photoshop's Scratch Disk (similar to Windows Page File). G: will be used for 'other' files like music, photos, etc. and H: will be a rather large partition where I back-up ALL data from ALL machines on my LAN (also running an Ubuntu box as a web and mail server, an OS X box just for fun and my g/f's laptop)
I'm still uncertain about a few things:
will partitioning my 500gb drive increase the likelihood of having issues thus defeating the purpose of it being my backup?
Is an external USB drive going to be too slow to be my primary Scratch Disk for Photoshop - am I better off keeping the Windows Page file on the same drive as Windows (C:) and using the D: partition of the 80gb HD for Photoshop's scratch disk?
One other variation that I can throw in the mix would be to install an old 10gb SCSI drive I have laying around. This could be used for a Scratch Disk or Page file. But is using an old (probably slower than USB) dedicated drive for 1 of these purposes worse than using a partition of a newer drive?
Sorry for the long post. If anyone was able to follow my ramble and has some wistom to share, I'd be most appreciative.
Thanks,
-dave