PDA

View Full Version : WNT signalling can stimulate wing regeneration in chick embryos


Wise Young
11-18-2006, 05:36 AM
Note that lithium strongly increases WNT/beta-catenin signalling and is a therapy that we will be starting to test in spinal cord injury in the ChinaSCINet.

Wise.

http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/scientist-regrow-chicken-wing-12031.html
Chop off a salamander's leg and a brand new one will sprout in no time. But most animals have lost the ability to replace missing limbs. Now, a research team at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies has been able to regenerate a wing in a chick embryo -- a species not known to be able to regrow limbs -- suggesting that the potential for such regeneration exists innately in all vertebrates, including humans.

Their study, published in the advance online edition of Genes and Development on Nov. 17, demonstrates that vertebrate regeneration is under the control of the powerful Wnt signaling system: Activating it overcomes the mysterious barrier to regeneration in animals like chicks that can't normally replace missing limbs while inactivating it in animals known to be able to regenerate their limbs (frogs, zebrafish, and salamanders) shuts down their ability to replace missing legs and tails.

"In this simple experiment, we removed part of the chick embryo's wing, activated Wnt signaling, and got the whole limb back - a beautiful and perfect wing," said the lead author, Juan Carlos Izpis�a Belmonte, Ph.D., a professor in the Gene Expression Laboratory. "By changing the expression of a few genes, you can change the ability of a vertebrate to regenerate their limbs, rebuilding blood vessels, bone, muscles, and skin - everything that is needed."

This new discovery "opens up an entirely new area of research," Belmonte says. "Even though certain animals have lost their ability to regenerate limbs during evolution, conserved genetic machinery may still be present, and can be put to work again," he said. Previously, scientists believed that once stem cells turned into muscles, bone or any other type of cells, that was their fate for life � and if those cells were injured, they didn't regenerate, but grew scar tissue.

Manipulating Wnt signaling in humans is, of course, not possible at this point, Belmonte says, but hopes that these findings may eventually offer insights into current research examining the ability of stem cells to build new human body tissues and parts. For example, he said Wnt signaling may push mature cells go back in time and "dedifferentiate" into stem-like cells, in order to be able to then differentiate once more, producing all of the different tissues needed to build a limb.

<more>

cljanney
11-18-2006, 10:54 PM
Hmmmmmm, if it takes being called a chicken to get my arm back, I guess I can take it.

Great post, thanx Wise!

Wise Young
11-19-2006, 11:04 AM
Hmmmmmm, if it takes being called a chicken to get my arm back, I guess I can take it.

Great post, thanx Wise!

The critical question is whether or not the ability to regenerate is something that evolved late in evolution or something that was present in our ancestors and we have the ability but somehow suppressed it. I believe that that latter is true. The reason is that many very primitive vertebrates have the ability to regenerate their spinal cords. For example, the lamprey is phylogentically amongst the earliest and most primitive of vertebrates. They are able to regenerate their spinal cords.

It makes a difference whether we have the genes to regenerate and simply used a signalling mechanism such as WNT/catenin pathway to suppress those genes or we would have to evolve the mechanisms for regenerating the spinal cord. It is also important if it is true we were once able to regenerate but evolved mechanisms to suppress regeneration. This would suggest that regeneration is a two-edged sword and has some evolutionary disadvantages that required us to turn it off.

Wise.

adi chicago
11-19-2006, 11:24 AM
great post dr.wise.

cljanney
11-19-2006, 03:59 PM
It is also important if it is true we were once able to regenerate but evolved mechanisms to suppress regeneration. This would suggest that regeneration is a two-edged sword and has some evolutionary disadvantages that required us to turn it off.

Wise.

I was thinking this same thing. If certain animals have the ability to regenerate limbs, and the byproduct of that regeneration doesn't put the rest of that animals health at risk, then why would this trait be one that other animals would evolve away from? What is the evolutionary reasoning behind this? I can think of some reasons why in today's thrill seeking world having the ability to replace limbs at will could be dangerous, lot's of kids taking risks beyond any sense of rational because they could always regenerate a new body part once one was destroyed. Discovering that reason would be very interesting, hopefully it's something we can work with.


Chris