PDA

View Full Version : Time Magazine Touts Cannabis As ‘Legitimate Medical Trend’


parafarmer
12-06-2005, 12:46 PM
Americans for Safe Access For Immediate Release: December 5, 2005 -------------------------------- Time Magazine Touts Cannabis As ‘Legitimate Medical Trend’

Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Studies for Alzheimer’s, Rheumatoid Arthritis Cited

Patient Advocacy Group Prepares to Sue HHS For Failure to Respond to Evidence

OAKLAND – Today’s issue of Time magazine reports that new research on the medical use of marijuana is one of the most significant medical developments of 2005. This article comes just one week after the final deadline for response to a legal challenge brought by a medical marijuana advocacy group that asks the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to stop claiming there is no medical use for marijuana.

According to Time, “Research into the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis continued to bolster the case for the medicinal use of marijuana, making the ‘patient pot laws’ that have passed in 11 states seem less like a social movement than a legitimate medical trend. One trial--the first controlled study of its kind--showed that a medicine containing cannabis extracts called Sativex not only lessened the pain of rheumatoid arthritis but actually suppressed the disease. An earlier study published in the Journal of Neuroscience showed that synthetic cannabinoids, the chemicals in marijuana, can reduce inflammation in the brain and may protect it from the cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer's disease.”

Despite the widespread acceptance of scientific research like this, the federal government continues to claim that there is no medical use for marijuana. That claim is being challenged by Americans for Safe Access, an Oakland-based medical marijuana advocacy group. HHS has yet to respond to the medical marijuana group’s administrative appeal of HHS’s earlier denial of its petition under the Data Quality Act, requesting the department correct its statements that marijuana is not considered to have medical value. As a result, Americans for Safe Access is preparing to sue HHS for its failure to respond. The appeal has been pending since last May, even though the department’s guidelines specify that it will respond to such requests within 60 calendar days.

“The government’s failure to meet its obligations under the DQA is a violation of its own procedures,” said Steph Sherer, ASA’s executive director. “HHS should not be standing in the way of medical advances.”

The Administrative Procedure Act allows judicial review to compel agency action when such action is “unreasonably” delayed. If Americans for Safe Access prevails in its petition, the Department of Health and Human Services will have to change its published information on medical marijuana and publicly admit that marijuana is now effectively used for medical treatment, clearing the way for medical reclassification that would allow doctors to prescribe it to their patients nationwide.

The United Kingdom reclassified marijuana from class B to class C in 2004, meaning they have determined marijuana has a low risk of addiction and few long-term health hazards. After one year, the government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs affirmed the reclassification. Despite concerns that reducing criminal penalties would increase use, the number of people using cannabis has fallen by more than 1% in the first full year after possession of the drug was made a less serious offense, and the UK has reportedly freed-up police resources to fight hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine.

I guess if you whip the public over the head long enough with the truth, change is inevitable. I read the article in Time and it took a second for the realization that a major media had just published an HONEST article about CANNABIS. Nice picture of a pot leaf, too.

Wage peace on war. END CANNABIS PROHIBITION NOW!

LaoziSailor
12-07-2005, 05:13 PM
(N)SATIVEX® -- Product Monograph

macska
12-07-2005, 07:18 PM
Amen to that !
Keep on rollin,keep on burning.

SurfCat
01-06-2006, 04:58 PM
Has anyone tried Sativex?

LaMemChose
01-06-2006, 05:09 PM
Does Sativex make you "high" or does it just reduce pain and spasms? I had had a problem with oxy addiction and don't want to head down that road again. I only take Neurontin for pain, but still hurt like hell.
Anyone have any experience?

Myc0
01-06-2006, 08:32 PM
I can say from experience that oxy and herb are completely different as far as addiction is concerned. I enjoyed marijuana and therefor smoked it regularly for years, but when something came up that gave me a reason to quit, I dropped it cold turkey with absolutely no problems. Since my sci I've been on the Oxy for pain management, and if I'm a couple of hours late on a dose I feel like my head is in a vice, along with all kinds of other nasty physical problems. TOTALLY different. God provides much better remedies than the pharmaceutical industry.

tocker
01-07-2006, 01:02 AM
Thank god :cry:

It is the only thing that makes a difference for the central pain...and I'm tired of feeling like a criminal.

and it's been one of those days with pain too :cry:

T

MrSoul
01-10-2006, 05:02 AM
Time for some good news:

11th state legalizes medical marijuana
www.CNN.com

PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island (AP) -- Rhode Island on Tuesday became the 11th state to legalize medical marijuana and the first since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June that patients who use the drug can still be prosecuted under federal law.

The House overrode a veto by Gov. Don Carcieri, 59-13, allowing people with illnesses such as cancer and AIDS to grow up to 12 marijuana plants or buy 2.5 ounces of marijuana to relieve their symptoms. Those who do are required to register with the state and get an identification card.

Federal law prohibits any use of marijuana. However, Maine, Vermont, Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington allow it to be grown and used for medicinal purposes.

The U.S. high court ruled June 6 that people who smoke marijuana because their doctors recommend it can still be prosecuted under federal drug laws, even if their states allow it.

Federal authorities, however, have conceded they are unlikely to prosecute many medicinal marijuana users.

"I'm sure everybody in this room knows at least one person who would have benefited from medical marijuana," Rhode Island state Rep. Thomas Slater, who has cancer, told fellow lawmakers before the vote. Slater said he doesn't use marijuana now but that it could become part of his treatment in the future.

Carcieri, unhappy with the override, said the law fails to provide ways for users to buy marijuana legally and leaves Rhode Islanders open to federal prosecution.

"Users will be forced to purchase marijuana in the illegal street market, putting them at risk and complicating the difficult jobs that our law enforcement personnel must do every day," the governor said.

Tom Riley, a spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy in Washington, said the vote showed "misguided and out-of-touch" views on the harms of marijuana.

"There's this notion from the '60s or the '70s that marijuana is a harmless drug," Riley said. "It's not."

parafarmer
01-13-2006, 04:28 PM
Newshawk: Is My Medicine Legal YET? www.immly.org
Source: Capital Times
Pubdate: 9 December 2006
Author: Dr. David Bearman

MEDICINAL MARIJUANA HAS LONG HISTORY AND MUCH VALUE

As the son of a pharmacist from Rice Lake, a 1963 graduate of the
University of Wisconsin who started his medical career in the Medical
School in Madison, and someone with almost 40 years' experience in the
field of drug abuse treatment and prevention and the last five years
evaluating patients for medicinal cannabis, I want to compliment Rep.
Gregg Underheim and the Wisconsin Assembly Health Committee for their
recognition of the contemporary medicinal value of cannabis.

The committee is approaching this seriously and getting valuable input.
It recognizes the 5,000 years of experience of medicinal use of
cannabis. It is aware that just over the border in Canada, tincture of
cannabis (Sativex) is being marketed by Bayer AG and in England the
Home
Office has given physicians the OK to prescribe tincture of cannabis.

I have taught courses on drugs at California universities and am very
familiar with the history of medicinal cannabis use in the United
States
from 1839 to the present, and aware of the American Medical
Association's testimony at the 1937 marijuana tax hearings that "the
AMA
knows of no danger in the use of cannabis and takes histories from
countless patients with severe medical illness who benefited from their
medicinal use of cannabis."

Consequently, I am baffled by the opposition of the Wisconsin Medical
Society. This does not represent the compassion shown by the doctors in
Rice Lake and Rochester who provided my father's care, nor does it
reflect the quality of basic science I was taught by the UW School of
Medicine in Madison.

I have seen patients who come in in wheelchairs, with canes, stooped in
pain, who tell of the relief they receive from cannabis. These are
people from all walks of life rich and poor, mostly over 40. Several
have broken down in tears after receiving their approval making it
legal
to grow and possess cannabis. They say they are not lawbreakers or
criminals and now can use this to medicate without fear of breaking the
law.

We have far too many problems in the country to waste government
resources arresting the ill and dying for using a medicine that
provides
relief and is legal in Canada, less than 100 miles from the Wisconsin
border.

Dr. David Bearman
Goleta, Calif.

bob clark
01-13-2006, 07:40 PM
The whole debate over whether pot should be legalized is ridiculous. The government refuses to back down because there is funding and jobs at stake. The DEA is nothing more than a "make work" jobs program. Especially as it concerns pot. If it were legalized it would be grown here in the US and wouldn't need to smuggled across the border. Oh no, the border and our national security.... and all those terrorists sneaking across it hiding underneath all those bales of reefer!

Tom Riley, a spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy in Washington, said the vote showed "misguided and out-of-touch" views on the harms of marijuana.

"There's this notion from the '60s or the '70s that marijuana is a harmless drug," Riley said. "It's not."

Lysol Spray can be harmful. And probably is more dangerous than pot even if it's used according to directions. Bar-b-que chicken is more dangerous (possible carcinogens) than boiled chicken. But who boils their chicken?

These rich folk who create and enforce the laws live behind iron gates on acres and acres of well manicured lawns. Let them move into a normal neighborhood and they'll change their tune with "real world" reality. In a neighborhood where their one neighbor is a pothead and the other is an alcoholic. The alcoholic has a car or two up on blocks in his front lawn. There's constant fighting going on with his wife and kids and the police show up every other Friday or Saturday night for domestic disturbances like beating the wife or blasting George Jones tunes on his rent-to-own stereo. And you can set your watch by the alky coming home at 2:27AM during the week as the bars close. Then he skids his battered truck to a stop on his lawn after leaving skid marks and tore up grass on yours.

The pothead on the other hand, after sending the kids to bed and tucking them in, sits his ass down next to his wife on the couch and sparks up a doober or hits a bong. After a couple of tokes the TV goes on and the ice cream and chips come out.

No hangover the next day... or bail money or fines or jail time wasted on DUIs. And the pothead is able to give his employer a full day of productive work unlike the alky who if he manages to show up spends half the day recuperating from the night before.

It's a no-brainer for most of us.... but not for the government. At least not quite yet. And I rarely smoke pot!