PDA

View Full Version : Marijuana Compound Spurs Brain Cell Growth


parafarmer
10-13-2005, 08:32 PM
Marijuana Compound Spurs Brain Cell Growth

By Alan Mozes, HealthDay Reporter
Source: Forbes Magazine

HealthDay News -- When it comes to the controversy surrounding medical
marijuana, an international team of researchers is busy stirring the
pot
by releasing findings that suggest the drug helps promote brain cell
growth while treating mood disorders.

According to the study in rats, a super-potent synthetic version of the
cannabinoid compound found in marijuana can reduce depression and
anxiety when taken over an extended period of time.

This mood boost seems to be the result of the drug's ability to promote
the growth of new brain cells, something no other addictive drug
appears
able to do, the researchers say.

The findings, which appear in the November issue of the Journal of
Clinical Investigation, remain preliminary, however.

"Our results were obtained from rats, and there's a big difference
between rats and humans," said study co-author Dr. Xia Zhang, of the
neuropsychiatry research unit in the department of psychiatry at the
University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. "So, I don't really
don't know yet if our findings apply to humans. But our results
indicate
that the clinical use of marijuana could make people feel better by
helping control anxiety and depression."

The new findings come on the heels of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in
June granting federal authorities the power to stop doctors from
prescribing marijuana. That decision also bars individuals from
cultivating the herb for medical purposes.

The decision overrides laws currently on the books in 11 states which
had legalized the use of marijuana for patients receiving a doctor's
approval. According to the ruling, the Supreme Court justices made
their
decision on the basis of interstate commerce regulations rather than on
an evaluation of the pros and cons of medical marijuana use.

But does medical marijuana work? To help settle that question, Zhang's
team focused on the potential of a synthetic laboratory-produced form
of
the cannabinoid compound naturally found in the marijuana plant.

Humans and other animals also naturally produce the compound, and are
known to have cannabinoid receptors lying on the surface of cells in
the
nervous system and the immune system.

Prior research has shown that, when exposed to cannabinoids, these
receptors can provoke an anti-inflammatory and anti-convulsive
response.
They can also instigate a range of psychotropic effects such as
euphoria.

The current study focused on a particular formulation of synthetic
cannabinoid known as HU210 -- a compound which Zhang described as the
most powerful cannabinoid in the world.

The authors explored both the short-term and long-term effects of
exposure to HU210 in rats.

To measure the drug's short-term response, they gave adult rats a
single
injection of HU210. To study the same drug's effect over the longer
term, the researchers gave a separate group of adult rats twice-daily
injections of the cannabinoid over a two-week period.

Autopsies revealed that by the end of the 10-day HU210 treatment
regimen, new neurons had been generated and integrated into the
circuitry of the hippocampus region of the rat's brains. This process,
known as neurogenesis, was still in evidence a full month after
treatment had been initiated.

Neurogenesis was not triggered in response to brain cells being killed
through cannabinoid exposure, the researchers add. In fact, HU210
injections did not appear to prompt any loss of neurons in the
hippocampus.

Cannabinoid use appeared to boost mood, as well: According to the
scientists, behavioral tests suggest that long-term treatment reduced
the rodent's anxiety- and depression-linked behaviors.

For example, one month post-treatment, treated rats deprived of food
for
48 hours were quicker than similarly deprived, non-treated rats to
begin
eating food when it was finally offered to them in an unfamiliar
environment.

The researchers believe treated rats may have been less anxious in the
manner they handled this novel situation. They stress the results were
not related to cannabinoids' appetite-stimulating effects, since the
treated rats' eating behavior was similar to that of untreated rats
when
they were offered food in a familiar setting.

Treated rats also responded in a less anxious manner to swimming and
climbing tests, and displayed shorter periods of immobility compared
with untreated rats. The latter finding was interpreted to mean that
HU210 had an antidepressant effect on rats receiving the cannabinoid
over the longer term.

However, while long-term administration of higher doses worked to
reduce
anxiety and depression, lower doses did not appear to have the same
effect, the researchers added.

Zhang and his associates credit cannabinoid-linked neurogenesis with
the
apparent mood shifts seen in the animals.

The hippocampus area of the brain where the neuronal growth occurred is
key to the regulation of stress and other mood disorders, Zhang's team
point out. This region is also important to the control of cognitive
processes such as learning and memory.

Among the common addictive drugs, marijuana alone appears able to
promote neurogenesis when used over time and in the right dosage, the
researchers say. In contrast, prior research has demonstrated that
chronic administration of cocaine, opiates, alcohol and nicotine
inhibits brain cell growth.

"If our results can be confirmed in humans, we should anticipate the
chronic use of marijuana as a medical treatment for anxiety and
depression," Zhang said.

However, he cautioned that "this treatment is not the same as smoking
marijuana. Whether smoking marijuana can produce the same effect, we
just don't know."

Dr. Perry G. Fine, a professor of anesthesiology at the University of
Utah School of Medicine Pain Research Center, said more than enough
data
has already been gathered to confirm medical marijuana's potential
benefits.

"It's great that there's new science, but to me this is no longer an
epiphany," he said. "It's just proving what's been long-suspected.
We're
behind the curve with the cannabinoids largely because of the stigma of
marijuana going years and years back."

"I think most people with clinical expertise in the area of palliative
medicine know that if patients had access to all the tools we currently
have, we could certainly do a whole lot better to help people live with
multiple chronic diseases," he added. "The social policies are way
behind our technology, and that's where we need some catching up."

More information:

For more on the medical marijuana debate, check out:
http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/pop/conflicts.htm

Source: Forbes Magazine (US)
Author: Alan Mozes, HealthDay Reporter
Published: October 13, 2005
Copyright: 2005 Forbes Inc.
Contact: readers@forbes.com
Website: http://www.forbes.com/

dejerine
10-14-2005, 08:20 AM
Para,

This is really a fascinating post, especially after the article on the hippocampus at painonline.com which we have been discussing here that maybe severe pain would keep the hippocampus from being able to regenerate the cells around it which protect it, OR that some trauma in younger days may predispose to the injuries behind Central Pain. It is fascinating research. (By the way, the webmaster at that site emailed that they are moving servers and will be down a while). I am still concerned about lung cancer because of the many toxins in most marijuana, the risk supposedly being double for using marijuana over tobacco. I wonder how anything, not just HU210 helps both anxiety and depression, polar opposites, but maybe here is a reasonable mechanism.

The question about what is federalism just keeps coming up over and over again. The Civil War supposedly dealt with it, but there is still the question of whether individual states have the right to create societies according to the wishes of their own citizens. The constitution says definitely yes, but the Supreme Court judges of late have been almost as if there were no such thing as federalism. The new Judge Roberts argued that states have no right to decide whether they will allow doctor assisted euthanasia. His tone was troubling since he said, "If we allow states to decide such things, then it would limit the power of the federal government". Some people thought his remarks were self negating. This reflects a Supreme Court which doesn't recognize much beyond itself. For MANY years, it has been bedrock legal philosophy that Congress had the right to determine the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, ie what kinds of cases that particular court could hear. Roberts disagreed with this right of Congress in his interview, and it appears Harriet Miers also disagress, but we will have to wait and see. For years this was one of the "checks and balances" in our government, that Congress determined the jurisidiction of the Supreme Court. Up until the Civil War it was legal to sue justices who decided cases with malice against the party, but the courts said that was unconstitutional, to avoid the cases where northern appointed judges routinely held against southerners whose wealth and properties were confiscated by carpetbaggers, who were typically ex northern soldiers and scoundrels who went through smaller communities robbing everyone at gunpoint. The cases were heard in federal court and the northern judges were giving away just about everything to the carpetbaggers to punish their former enemies. My great grandfather was hung when he could not produce any gold coins to a carpetbagger official going from one Tennessee farm to the next, robbing every family. His wife just had to stand there and watch him turn blue and then die. She cut him down after they left, but it was too late. This robbery by officials was not rare in eastern Tennessee. There were so many suits over this kind of thing that the Supreme Court just said it was unconstitutional to sue judges for anything, ever. That was the end of that right. So we are in for a very big, very powerful, Supreme Court. If so, then none of the marijuana research is going to mean anything, since current decisions seem focused on telling states to jump in the lake, and don't mess with the big powerful feds. This, of course, is why Jefferson and Madison wrote federalism into the constitution. This is why we have a Senate as well as a House, to reflect regions as well as people. The current power sucking by the Supreme Court possibly reflects the fact that not only high schools but colleges as well, and even law schools, don't even teach about federalism, although Madison's famous tract, Federalist Number 10 has always been called the "foundation of American democracy". Quote from it, "The only cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy". Jefferson said democracy would only work if competing ideas as reflected in the scattered states and regions balanced out overdominant ideas coming from one power source. He was speaking of the liquor industry which was buying elections for grain growing states to form a grain cartel (Shay's Rebellion), but at the time that was the greatest threat to democratic government, which was actually failing, and the cure was the Louisiana purchase, which broke the back of the cartel. Jefferson and Madison both concluded democracy would not work in any small country nor in any country where federalism could not balance out the central government. Unless we regain the sense that regions may be unique, and still democractic and legal, I doubt we will see any state legalizing marijuana.

alan
10-15-2005, 09:26 PM
Is painonline.con still up? I haven't been able to connect to it for a week.

dejerine
10-16-2005, 08:02 AM
Alan,

I had the same problem. The webmaster told me they are changing to a new server and are experiencing delays.

LaoziSailor
10-17-2005, 05:38 PM
dejerine,

I though your post was most informative. I made reference to it in the thread 53363 which IMO is somewhat related.

Cheers!