PDA

View Full Version : When playing a CD becomes a "privilege," not a right


jimnms
09-26-2005, 02:35 AM
I've spent part of my tenure here at Ars trying to warn people about the encroaching affront to our culture being brought about at the behest of the entertainment industry. It has consistently been my position that technologies like "Digital Rights Management" are less about preventing piracy, and more about finding new ways to nickel-and-dime customers. Through DRM and "contracts" for content, fair use rights are being eroded.

Of course, the industry is trying to accomplish its objective by publicly lamenting piracy. If the public and "their" politicians believe that the entertainment industry is on the verge of collapse, they'll be much more likely to accept restrictions on use of content that they've paid for. For this reason, most industry talking heads keep their comments in check when talking about DRM schemes, but from time to time we've seen people truly speak their mind. Such is the case with Tommi Kyyrä, of IFPI Finland. Mr. Kyyrä told Tietokone (Finnish) that the ability to play CDs on computers is a "privilege," and that people who have problems with CDs laden with DRM should just buy new CD players.

"Now, we need to understand that listening to music on your computer is an extra privilege. Normally people listen to music on their car or through their home stereos," said Kyyrä. "If you are a Linux or Mac user, you should consider purchasing a regular CD player." (Translation via tigert.com)
The comments come in the context of a debate over copy-protected CDs. As we have previously reported, CDs with copy protection do not play on all CD players, although this is certainly not just limited to computer CD players. Some older players also won't play the discs, either.

Full Story (http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050922-5339.html)
IMO, this is the entertainment industry digging it's own grave.

Zeus
09-26-2005, 03:21 AM
IMO, this is the entertainment industry digging it's own grave.
This attitude makes people want to pirate. You can only treat your customers with contempt if you have a monopoly on the goods they desire. Peer-to-peer networks etc. have eroded the RIAA members' monopolies, and they're struggling to respond.

The iTunes Music Store has been one of the few stars in recent years, and now they want to screw that up too. I can't believe record industry execs now think they deserve to receive a share of the iPod revenue stream (check out arstechnica.com for the related article)!

It's the RIAA's greed that will bury them. Steve Jobs has tried to explain to the execs that they're competing against piracy. Most teens have low disposable income, access to the internet, and loads of free time (esp. over summer). Jack up the price of new singles on iTunes, and watch their sales dry up while piracy further explodes...

Chris.

teyrn
09-26-2005, 04:25 PM
I like itunes and some other pay per song download sites. The price at .99 cents is a good buy. Should that price increase or artists disapear because some record execs think they aren't getting enough money, I will go back to piracy in a heart beat.

Varian
10-03-2005, 01:40 AM
I was hearing Itunes charges 99 cents a song. They pay for the servers, advertising, customer service, hell almost everything. Yet they only get 29 cents per song the rest goes to those greedy corporations. And now they are saying that's not good enough. That's rather suspicious.