PDA

View Full Version : Bob Dole on the Medicare Homebound Rule


Sue Pendleton
06-27-2002, 02:12 PM
washingtonpost.com
Imprisoned by Medicare

By Bob Dole

Thursday, June 27, 2002; Page A31

Heroes inspire us to achieve the unachievable, to leave America a better place for future generations. They remind us that contributing to family and community is our highest priority. I am fortunate to know such a hero, and his story has inspired me to help achieve his one simple wish before he dies -- to change a Medicare restriction so that he and thousands of others who live with permanent and severe disabilities can leave their homes to see their children grow up and contribute to their community without losing life-sustaining home health services.

David Jayne was diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's disease at age 27. Otherwise known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), this degenerative neuromuscular condition causes his muscles to atrophy, leaving him unable to eat, breathe or move on his own. Though his mobility is limited to moving three fingers, Jayne, now 41, has demonstrated to everyone who knows him or has read about him that the human spirit is indomitable.

I met David Jayne by chance at Reagan National Airport about a year ago. Attached to life support equipment and a computerized voice simulator because of his body's deterioration at the hand of ALS, Jayne had traveled with the help of friends from his home in Rex, Ga., to meet with his elected members of Congress. He came to urge them to amend the Medicare homebound restriction.

The homebound rule was intended to deter abuse of the home health benefit by limiting services to only those individuals whose illnesses and disabilities are so severe that leaving the home would require "a considerable and taxing effort." In the 1960s, when this rule was created, it reflected the limits of health care and technology at the time. It was incomprehensible then to think that someone with ALS or any severe and permanent disability could leave the home.

While the homebound restriction has not changed, the role of physicians and home health providers has. Nurses, doctors and home health administrators have been turned into watchdogs and given the responsibility to report any knowledge of their patients leaving their homes. And the awful reality of those receiving these services is that they must either lie or cheat just to enjoy fundamental liberties.

This nearly 40-year-old policy reflects an outmoded view of life for persons with disabilities. Thanks to advances in technology and greater community accessibility through the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), people with the most severe disabilities are able to leave their homes to go to work, volunteer in their communities and enjoy their family and friends. Unfortunately, Medicare policy has not kept pace with our times and is now punishing the very people it was intended to benefit. While Medicare has developed other and better policies to deter abuse, it has kept this outdated policy.

The Medicare statute does allow for absences from the home of "infrequent" or "relatively short duration." But the vagueness of this allowance leaves it to Medicare contractors to interpret just how many absences qualify as "frequent" and just how short those absences might be. To err on the conservative side, contractors have stripped home health coverage from those most needing it, including David Jayne, whose life depends on a ventilator, intravenous feeding and daily care from a home health aide. Because Jayne's story went public, his home health agency discontinued these life-sustaining services. They were only reinstated after members of Congress became involved and Jayne agreed to pay his home health provider for any claim denied by Medicare. But thousands of others live in fear of leaving their homes because of the stories that have been reported. In two heartbreaking cases, one mother's services were cut off after she attended the funeral for her child, while another mother did not attend the funeral of her child because of fear of losing her home health care.

For millions of Americans, Medicare-covered home health services provide a less costly alternative to nursing home or hospital care. There are abuses that should be corrected, but not by extracting a price that no law-abiding American should ever have to pay.

David Jayne has inspired many people with his love and determination and his simple words, "Always wait another day because the next day will be better." He inspired me to volunteer to try to help.

I urge the House of Representatives to amend this harsh restriction on individual freedom by including in the Medicare reform bill the David Jayne Amendment, carefully drafted by Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), to do what we all know in our hearts is right, including all the appropriate safeguards to prevent abuse. And if this is not possible because of cost concerns, to adopt an amendment to provide for those who are severely and permanently disabled and who require the assistance of an attendant or a skilled nursing facility.

The amendment should give the Health and Human Services Department six months to address the homebound rule and make recommendations on how to bring it up to date with today's technology. Make no mistake, David Jayne is a prisoner -- a prisoner in his specially designed wheelchair. His illness has robbed him of the ability to do anything without the aid of technology. Medicare shouldn't act as jailer too. Thousands of David Jaynes across America are looking to the president, Congress and the Department of Health and Human Services for help.

Former senator Dole is volunteer honorary chairman of the National Coalition to Amend the Homebound Restriction.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company

Sue Pendleton
06-27-2002, 02:25 PM
http://www.amendhomeboundpolicy.homestead.com/

For those interested in helping end this stupid and restrictive rule.

SCI-Nurse
06-27-2002, 06:49 PM
Thank you for sharing this article that rightfully highlights and gives tribute to David Jayne, an incredible man, his persistent efforts, beliefs and compassion for others. CRF

Lizbv
06-28-2002, 06:33 AM
Medicare Guidelines are used in private health ins. policies also. Since home health care is not federally mandated by the gov't, they use these guidelines which state you must be homebound. As a working individual w a disability, it affects these people too. The government and private industry cries "diversity! diversity!", ticket to work, vocational rehabilitation, etc etc. but where have we peoiple with disabilities gone? Almost nowhere. Most all of my paycheck goes to my aides, because I am not homebound. I fight day and night to keep my aides. Something has got to CHANGE!

David Jayne was trying to get a meeting with President Bush in May that Dole set up. I wonder if it happened?

TD
07-10-2002, 04:00 PM
I have had my HHA discontinued because my wife works for a living and makes too much money to allow us to qualify. I have also had a hard time keeping a HHA because I try to be independent.

"And so it begins."

SCI-Nurse
07-10-2002, 06:23 PM
TD - Has this action just occurred? Have you tried to appeal the decision? Two advocacy groups that you may want to contact include: Families USA at: www.familiesusa.org (http://www.familiesusa.org) and American Association of People with Disabilities: www.aapd-dc.org (http://www.aapd-dc.org) as well as the National Council on Independent Living at: www.ncil.org (http://www.ncil.org) CRF

cindyg
03-01-2003, 01:13 PM
I've been wondering for awhile, has anything beeen passed or decided on this Medicare Homebound status thing?