joyneau
06-12-2002, 05:17 AM
Dr has stated to me that: " It is not necessary to undergo spinal fusion for a disc herniation in most cases."
Because I have nerve impingement on the thecal sac, is this what is warrenting a fusion?> It has been suggested to me by the ortho that fusion would be best due to the fact that other areas of my spine are slightly problematic and he feels that any other procedure would eventually lead to re-herniation of the disc in question[if I were to have any other procedure], because this disc would work overtime trying to take up slack and just re-injure itself.
Fusion is MAJOR. What is your opinion on this reasoning? Does it sound logical?
The microscopic procedures you mentioned to me in my other post seemed reasonable, does fusion with BAK seem reasonable too?
If I am headed to surgery-I want to get it right the first time and not have to repeat down the road!
Thanks so much. God Bless.
Joyce
Because I have nerve impingement on the thecal sac, is this what is warrenting a fusion?> It has been suggested to me by the ortho that fusion would be best due to the fact that other areas of my spine are slightly problematic and he feels that any other procedure would eventually lead to re-herniation of the disc in question[if I were to have any other procedure], because this disc would work overtime trying to take up slack and just re-injure itself.
Fusion is MAJOR. What is your opinion on this reasoning? Does it sound logical?
The microscopic procedures you mentioned to me in my other post seemed reasonable, does fusion with BAK seem reasonable too?
If I am headed to surgery-I want to get it right the first time and not have to repeat down the road!
Thanks so much. God Bless.
Joyce