PDA

View Full Version : Researchers Produce Motor Neurons from Embryonic Stem Cells


Jeremy
07-18-2002, 10:43 AM
Researchers Produce Motor Neurons from Embryonic Stem Cells


July 18, 2002- Beginning with cultured mouse embryonic stem cells, researchers have administered a precise mix of chemical signals to coax the cells to differentiate into functioning motor neurons.

The achievement was made possible by a decade of work in deciphering the signals that trigger differentiation of motor neurons, which are responsible for controlling the movement of muscles. The experiments represent an important step in applying that knowledge to grow functioning neurons from stem cells - undifferentiated cells that have the potential to become many different types of adult cells.

According to the researchers, the success of the experiments with mouse cells suggests that the same type of approach might be used to grow human motor neurons from stem cells. Such neurons could enable regeneration of nerve tissue lost to disease or trauma.

The experiments by researchers led by Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Thomas Jessell at Columbia University were reported in an article that was given immediate early publication status by the journal Cell and published online on July 17, 2002. The research was funded in part by Project A.L.S.

For more than 15 years, Jessell and his colleagues have been attempting to untangle the delicate connections of nerve cells in the developing spinal cord. Their studies have shown that the fledgling vertebrate nervous system is crackling with activity - genes are being turned on and off at a rapid pace, transforming immature cells into a billions-strong network of specialized neural cells. Ultimately, Jessell hopes that his research will provide a more thorough understanding of how the central nervous system (CNS) is constructed - this, he says, may suggest new ways to repair diseased or damaged components of the mature CNS.

According to Jessell, the attempt to generate motor neurons from stem cells relied on many years of research to identify the chemical cues in the developing embryo that coax "naïve neuroprogenitor" cells to differentiate into spinal cord motor neurons. These chemical signals "direct" ES cells down a developmental pathway in successive stages -first into neurons and ultimately into ever more specialized spinal cord motor neurons. Two of the key signals, said Jessell, are retinoic acid, which converts mid-brain neural cells into spinal cord progenitors, and Sonic hedgehog, a protein that converts spinal cord progenitor cells into motor neurons.

"Until now, we have been trying to piece together these steps as individual bites," said Jessell. "But we hadn't shown that the normal signaling factors could be used conjointly to take a naïve class of progenitors like ES cells, and by sequential exposure to these factors, recapitulate this developmental pathway."

First author Hynek Wichterle, a postdoctoral fellow in Jessell's laboratory, began by using retinoic acid and other chemical cues to induce ES cells to differentiate into mid-brain-type neurons and then into spinal cord neurons. The scientists could follow the steps of differentiation by looking for the expression of specific transcription factors that define the identity of cells as spinal cord progenitor cells.

"Retinoids will give you spinal cord identity, but that doesn't determine exactly which type of neuron emerges from these spinal cord progenitor cells," said Jessell. "And that's where Sonic hedgehog becomes important, because our work and that of others had shown that you need Sonic hedgehog signaling at exactly the right level of signal activation to generate motor neurons."

Thus, when the scientists exposed the cultured spinal cord neurons to appropriate levels of the Sonic hedgehog protein, the cells differentiated to become motor neurons. The dependence of this differentiation on a narrow concentration range of the Sonic hedgehog protein is significant, said Jessell, because in developing embryos the amount of Sonic hedgehog governs what type of neuron will be generated.

In additional experiments, the scientists used ES cells from transgenic mice whose motor neurons were tagged with a fluorescent marker. The fluorescent tagging enabled Jessell and his colleagues to monitor, isolate and purify the specific motor neurons they had induced - a technique that Jessell believes will be crucial to further attempts to define the signaling pathways involved in neuronal differentiation.

The researchers were also able to address an important question, namely, whether the motor neurons they had developed in culture could actually function in living animals. "We needed to demonstrate how well these in vitro-generated motor neurons did when they were put into a living embryo," Jessell said. "So, Hynek managed the very impressive technical feat of reintroducing these ES-cell-derived motor neurons back into the spinal cords of chick embryos at a stage when normal motor neurons are being generated." The scientists then tested in the chick embryos how well the introduced neurons survived, integrated themselves into the embryonic spinal cord and extended their long cable-like axons toward their normal targets in muscle.

"I think our results documented that these ES-cell-derived motor neurons do a pretty good job of mimicking their embryo-derived counterparts in all of those three tests," said Jessell. "In general, I was pleasantly surprised by how well neuralized ES cells recapitulate the developmental events that we have come to associate with motor neuron progenitors and motor neurons."

Jessell believes that these successes represent only the beginning of a promising line of research. "This is just the starting point for trying to take a rational approach to studying the ability of ES-cell-derived motor neurons to restore function, not just in an embryonic context, but in a more relevant adult context," he said.

Jessell and his colleagues hope to use ES-generated motor neurons in experiments to identify all the genes that govern the pathways of motor neuron differentiation. They are also developing collaborations with neurologists to explore in mouse models whether their motor neurons can regenerate spinal cords that have been damaged by trauma or neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The researchers also plan to explore whether the signaling pathways of motor neuron differentiation mice resemble those in humans. "I think one can be cautiously optimistic that such parallels will exist," said Jessell. "While many scientists have shown that human ES cells can give rise to neurons, we don't know exactly which type of neurons they are. And, there's a much greater heterogeneity in the properties of human ES cells than in mouse ES cells; so it may be necessary to sift through a number of the available human ES cell lines before arriving at a cell which behaves as its mouse counterpart. But, in principle there is no reason why this type of approach might not be successful with human cells," he said.

"If the wind could blow my troubles away. I'd stand in front of a hurricane."

Max
07-19-2002, 01:03 PM
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/07/020719073353.htm

numbnuts
07-19-2002, 01:41 PM
Don't let James Kelly see this. He's liable to have a conniption.

KIM
07-26-2002, 11:06 AM
Summary: Thomas Jessell's laboratory examines the molecular mechanisms by which neuronal cell types in the vertebrate central nervous system are generated and interconnected, particularly sensory and motor neurons in the developing spinal cord.


The analysis of neuronal circuitry in the spinal cord, beginning with the pioneering physiological and anatomical studies of Charles Sherrington and Santiago Ramón y Cajal, has provided a rigorous cellular framework for interpreting the neural basis of sensory-motor function. More recently, molecular studies on the development of spinal cord neurons, in particular motor neurons, have begun to reveal general strategies that are used to establish neuronal diversity and circuitry in the vertebrate central nervous system. Our studies of the development of spinal cord circuitry are focused on how neurons acquire their unique identities, how neurons project their axons to specific targets, and how selective synaptic connections are formed.

The Specification of Motor Neuron Identity
The patterning of many embryonic tissues depends on inductive signals that specify cell fates at different concentration thresholds, linking cell position to cell fate. Within the ventral neural tube, the identity of progenitor cells is assigned initially by the actions of the secreted factor Sonic hedgehog (Shh). Studies performed with Gary Struhl (HHMI, Columbia University) have recently provided direct evidence that Shh activity is graded along the dorsoventral axis of the neural tube. This graded Shh signaling establishes distinct ventral progenitor domains by regulating the expression of Pax, Nkx, Dbx, and Irx homeodomain proteins. These proteins can be subdivided into two classes based on their regulation by Shh signaling. Class I proteins are expressed by neural progenitor cells in the absence of Shh signaling, and their expression is repressed by Shh, whereas the expression of the class II proteins depends on exposure to Shh. The establishment of progenitor cell identity involves cross-regulatory interactions between complementary pairs of homeodomain proteins. These interactions define the spatial extent of individual progenitor domains and establish sharp boundaries between adjacent domains, ensuring that progenitor cells within individual domains acquire distinct identities. The profile of homeodomain protein expression within a progenitor cell also directs neuronal fates. Most strikingly, several of these progenitor homeodomain proteins can induce the ectopic generation of neuronal subtypes when misexpressed outside the confines of their normal progenitor domains.

The activity of these progenitor homeodomain proteins reflects their function as transcriptional repressors. Collaborative studies with Johan Ericson (Karolinska Institute, Sweden) have shown that most of the homeodomain proteins implicated in ventral neural patterning share a motif related to the core Engrailed homology 1 region of the Engrailed repressor domain. This motif mediates interactions with Groucho-TLE (Gro/TLE) corepressors and is crucial to the function of these proteins as repressors in neural patterning. These findings have revealed a common mechanism of action of the progenitor homeodomain proteins involved in ventral patterning.

How is motor neuron identity linked to the exit of motor neuron progenitors from the cell cycle? We have found that the coordination of these two differentiation programs is achieved by a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor, Olig2, that is expressed selectively by motor neuron progenitors. The role of Olig2 in the specification of motor neuron identity depends on regulatory interactions with the homeodomain proteins discussed above, whereas its role in promoting cell cycle exit pan-neuronal properties is achieved through expression of another bHLH protein, Ngn2. Once again, both aspects of Olig2 function appear to depend on its activity as a transcriptional repressor. These studies reinforce the idea that the spatial pattern of neurogenesis in the ventral neural tube is achieved through the repression of repressors-a derepression strategy of neuronal fate determination.

In addition to the Shh-mediated signaling events that establish neuronal pattern along the dorsoventral axis of the neural tube, distinct classes of motor neurons are generated at different positions along the rostrocaudal axis of the spinal cord. One feature of the rostrocaudal organization of spinal motor neurons is a position-dependent expression of Hox genes, but little has been revealed about how this aspect of motor neuron subtype identity is assigned. We have examined the expression profile of Hox-c proteins to define the source and identity of patterning signals that impose motor neuron positional identity along the rostrocaudal axis of the spinal cord. These studies have shown that the convergent activities of fibroblast growth factor, bone morphogenetic protein, and retinoid signals originating from Hensen's node and the paraxial mesoderm help to establish the rostrocaudal positional identity of motor neurons in the developing spinal cord.

The Molecular Control of Motor Axon Pathfinding
The fidelity with which neurons select axonal trajectories during embryonic development plays a key role in the assembly of neuronal circuits. Motor neurons innervate many different muscle targets, and the location of motor neurons within the spinal cord is linked to target position. For example, motor neurons that innervate limb muscles are located in the lateral motor column (LMC) and are generated only at levels of the neural tube that lie in register with the limb fields. LMC neurons initially project their axons along a common path, but at the base of the limb the motor nerve bifurcates to form distinct dorsal and ventral branches. The initial selection of a ventral or dorsal trajectory by the axons of LMC neurons is directed by signals provided by mesenchymal cells encountered by motor axons as they enter the limb. In addition, the decision of motor axons to project within the dorsal or ventral nerve branch correlates with the position of motor neurons within the LMC. Neurons in the medial (m) division of the LMC extend axons exclusively into the ventral nerve branch, whereas neurons in the lateral (l) division project axons only into the dorsal nerve.

The mediolateral division of the LMC is marked by the differential expression of two LIM homeodomain transcription factors, Isl1 and Lim1. In addition, the LIM homeodomain protein Lmx1b is selectivity expressed in cells of the dorsal limb mesenchyme. In collaborative studies with Randy Johnson (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center), we have found that LIM homeodomain proteins control the dorsal and ventral trajectories of LMC axons as they enter the limb. In the absence of Lim1 function, the axons of LMC(l) neurons project at equal incidence into dorsal and ventral limb. Lmx1b function is required by limb mesenchymal cells to direct the dorsoventral trajectories of both LMC(l) and LMC(m) axons. Together, these findings show that LIM homeodomain proteins coordinate a binary choice of motor axon trajectory along the dorsoventral axis of the limb. Our ongoing studies suggest that LIM homeodomain proteins control the trajectory of motor axons through the regulation of Ephrin and Eph kinase receptor signaling.

After these major motor axon pathways have been established, more-refined programs of axonal growth are initiated. The axons of specific sets of LMC neurons project to individual muscles in the limb, and their axons invade target muscles and establish stereotypic branching patterns. The motor neurons that project their axons to an individual limb muscle are clustered together in small groups, termed motor pools, and each pool occupies a stereotyped position within the LMC. Neurons within individual motor pools can be distinguished by the expression of members of the ETS gene family, notably ER81 and PEA3. The onset of ETS gene expression by motor neurons occurs only as motor axons reach the base of the limb bud, and removal of the limb target at early developmental stages in chick prevents the onset of ER81 and PEA3 expression. We have therefore examined whether the expression of ETS genes by motor neurons regulates the innervation of muscle targets by motor axons, in studies performed in collaboration with the labs of Silvia Arber (Biocentrum, Basel, Switzerland) and Christopher Henderson (INSERM, Luminy, France). In the absence of PEA3 function, the axons of motor neurons fail to invade their target muscles and do not arborize normally, leading to marked defects in the innervation of target muscles. These findings indicate that the peripherally regulated induction of ETS gene expression in specific motor neuron pools directs late steps in the formation of motor axon trajectories.

The Control of Sensory-Motor Connectivity
Studies to examine the selectivity of synaptic connections are focused on the spinal monosynaptic stretch reflex circuit. In this circuit, connections are formed between two main classes of neurons: muscle sensory (proprioceptive) neurons and spinal motor neurons. The axons of proprioceptive neurons enter the spinal cord during embryonic development and form either direct or indirect connections with motor neurons. One class of proprioceptive neurons, group Ia afferents, form direct connections with the dendrites of motor neurons. A second class, group Ib afferents, project axons centrally only to the intermediate spinal cord, where synaptic contacts are made with interneurons but not with motor neurons. At a finer level of specificity, muscle spindle afferents form preferential connections with pools of motor neurons that innervate the same muscle group. The selectivity of connections formed between proprioceptive afferents and motor neurons is thought to have its basis in the selection of distinct afferent termination zones in the spinal cord and the recognition of specific neuronal targets.

Studies performed in collaboration with David Anderson (HHMI, California Institute of Technology) have shown that developing proprioceptive neurons and motor neurons are linked by the expression of ER81 and PEA3. Initially, ER81 and PEA3 are coexpressed by all proprioceptive neurons, but the expression of these two proteins soon segregates into distinct neuronal subsets. At the time that direct sensory-motor connections are formed, individual pools of motor neurons that express ER81 or PEA3 are innervated preferentially by proprioceptive afferents that express the same ETS protein, suggesting that the expression of ER81 and PEA3 contributes to the formation of selective connections between proprioceptive afferents and motor neurons. To test this possibility, we analyzed the development of sensory-motor connections in mice lacking ETS gene function, in collaboration with Eric Frank (University of Pittsburgh). ER81 mutant mice develop a severe defect in motor coordination that results from the failure of group Ia muscle spindle afferents to form their characteristic laminar termination zone in the ventral spinal cord. As a consequence, direct connections between group Ia proprioceptive afferents and motor neurons are dramatically reduced, and functional motor output is lost.

Together, the analysis of ER81 and PEA3 mutant mice indicates that late steps in the assembly of sensory-motor circuitry in the mammalian central nervous system are controlled by ETS class transcription factors. We are attempting to define the cellular basis of the defects in sensory and motor axon projections and to identify the relevant targets of these ETS transcription factors.

These studies are also supported by grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Leila and Harold Mathers Foundation, and Project A.L.S.



Last updated: July 22, 2002

KIM
08-11-2002, 11:00 AM
Now can someone tell me .What is Sonic hedgehog signaling ? http://sci.rutgers.edu/forum/images/smilies/confused.gif

antiquity
08-11-2002, 05:13 PM
From an earlier discussion about Sonic Hedgehog, Dr. Young states:

[QUOTE] Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) is a gene that was discovered some time ago by Jessel and his colleagues. It plays a major role in development of the spinal cord and is largely responsible neuronal differentiation. Now, they have discovered that this molecule promotes differentiation of stem cells into neurons.

In the early part of the 1990's, before the human genome was sequenced (and became public domain), many patents were issues for genes that were cloned. Even after a gene has been cloned or sequenced, a scientist or company could apply for a use patent, proposing its use for specific purposes. A use patent is not as iron-clad as a composition-of-matter patent. Nevertheless, these are two ways of patenting a human gene for therapeutic purposes.

Wise.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://carecure.org/forum/showpost.php?p=79298

antiquity
08-12-2002, 10:10 PM
Posted 12 August, 5 pm PST

A Recipe for Motor Neurons

Researchers have taken an important step closer to repairing broken neurons. A team has turned embryonic stem cells into nerve cells and transplanted them into the spinal cords of chicks, where they grew into motor neurons. The results show that given the right signals, stem cells can be turned into neurons of choice.

When you wiggle your toes, or move any other muscles, motor nerve cells in your spinal cord send commands to your muscles via long tentacles. These tentacles, called axons, can break when injured or diseased. So far, efforts to cure the resulting paralysis by regrowing the extensions have been unsuccessful in humans and have reduced paralysis in, but not cured, injured rats. Adult neurons are less adaptable than young neurons, however, and researchers have turned to embryonic stem (ES) cells--blank slates that can turn into any cell type in the body. By manipulating the molecules bathing ES cells, they hope to create progenitors that will turn into motor neurons when transplanted.

To do this, a team of researchers led by neuroscientist Thomas Jessell at Columbia University created a mouse strain that produced green fluorescent protein (GFP) only in certain motor neurons. They grew mouse embryos until they had 1000 cells. Then they doused them with retinoic acid, a compound that stimulates stem cells to become more like neuron progenitor cells. Next they added a dash of protein called sonic hedgehog, which steers them down the path to becoming spinal cord neurons. The team found that 20% to 30% of the embryonic cells transmogrified into glowing motor neuron progenitor cells, they report in the 9 August issue of Cell.

The team then separated out the GFP-containing progenitors and injected them into the spinal cord of embryonic chickens, where the transplanted cells would pick up growth signals. After 3 days, the green-colored neurons projected extensions from the spinal cord, which contacted muscles. This demonstrates that stem cells can be coaxed into motor neurons if treated the same way as in a growing animal. "Now, if we know what normal development requires, we can write out a recipe for making not only motor neurons, but any neuron type," says Jessell.

This "incredible paper" is a "huge step forward," says neurologist John McDonald at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. "It's a critical demonstration that ES-derived cells do the right thing, that they behave in a normal and appropriate way." Now that they know that, researchers can learn how to transplant the cells into older animals and, eventually, animals and people with real nerve injury.

Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*--MARY BECKMAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Max
08-14-2002, 01:07 PM
http://www.academicpress.com/inscight/08122002/grapha.htm