Chris Chappell
08-03-2001, 03:23 PM
Dr. Young or anyone out there.
Our secret heart transplant patient (59 yr. old male)in a detroit hospital has a completely artificial unit working for him. So far he's getting stronger, no signs of rejection. Exceeding everyone's expectations. To me this combination of medical application and technological wizardry are a fantastic combination and is an excellent example of how far we've come scientifically since Barney Clark and the Jarvik 7.
My question although simple in idea and concept but extremely difficult, and understood, in execution is; why can't, or doesn't the SCI research community explore extended usage of let's say microprocessors or advanced electronic technology to assist in ambulatory recovery? Microprocessors can execute billions of commands per second and are now the size of a pinhead. Maybe one inserted on either side of the injury? Nerve growth and regeneration aside wouldn't this, or another creative approach, be viable?
I know that ASU is doing their advanced FES walking program with all sorts of wires and electrodes and harnesses on the patient's exterior but what about wiring us up internally, below the skin's surface? (medical science is obviously getting better at controlling bodily rejection)
Crazy? Too far fetched? Has this been explored in depth?
I just can't help but think that a combination of medical science and technology couldn't help us.
Thanks, Chris
Our secret heart transplant patient (59 yr. old male)in a detroit hospital has a completely artificial unit working for him. So far he's getting stronger, no signs of rejection. Exceeding everyone's expectations. To me this combination of medical application and technological wizardry are a fantastic combination and is an excellent example of how far we've come scientifically since Barney Clark and the Jarvik 7.
My question although simple in idea and concept but extremely difficult, and understood, in execution is; why can't, or doesn't the SCI research community explore extended usage of let's say microprocessors or advanced electronic technology to assist in ambulatory recovery? Microprocessors can execute billions of commands per second and are now the size of a pinhead. Maybe one inserted on either side of the injury? Nerve growth and regeneration aside wouldn't this, or another creative approach, be viable?
I know that ASU is doing their advanced FES walking program with all sorts of wires and electrodes and harnesses on the patient's exterior but what about wiring us up internally, below the skin's surface? (medical science is obviously getting better at controlling bodily rejection)
Crazy? Too far fetched? Has this been explored in depth?
I just can't help but think that a combination of medical science and technology couldn't help us.
Thanks, Chris