PDA

View Full Version : BILL GATES IS CUTTING BACK.


PN
01-27-2002, 05:39 PM
Orange County Register, Wed. Jan. 2, 2002

"Not-as-deep pockets"
Charity - The biggest contributors gave less in 2001 than the previous year, down nearly 60 percent.

By Theresa Agovino, the Associated Press

New York

There must be a recession; even Bill Gates is cutting back.

And he's not alone. The super-rich are becoming much more frugal with their charitable giving.

The 10 largest single gifts to charity in 2001 totaled $4.6 billion, down nearly 60 percent from $11.08 billion the previous year.

Gates, the chairman of Microsoft Corp., retained the top stop on the list of large individual gifts compiled by the Chronicle of Philanthropy. But this year the world's richest man gave $2 billion to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation after donation $5 billion in 2000.

"This is just not as healthy a year but that isn't surprising given the state of the economy," said Stacy Palmer, the Chronicle's editor.

The decline in the size of donations by the wealthy comes in the same year when average Americans opened their wallets with extraordinary generosity to help the victims of Sept. 11.

"The kind of gifts given by the wealthy are dependent on the economy. It isn't the same as someone giving $10 to $30 for a cause, but the timing is ironic," said Palmer.

The Chronicle compiles its lists from public announcements made through the year.

Gordon Moore, co-founder and chairman emeritus of Intel Corp. and his wife, Betty, are the only other individuals who were also on the top 10 list last year, and their donation also dropped dramatically.

In 2001, their $300 million pledge to the California Institute of Technology for science and education programs was the third-largest on the list. In 2000, their $5 billion pledge to endow the Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation shared top honors with Gates' gift.

The second-largest gift this year was a $1.11 billion pledge by Jim Stowers and his wife, Virginia, to endow the Stowers Institute for Medical research. Stowers founded the America Century mutual-fund company.

Rounding out the top five were: Bill Coleman, founder of BEA Systems in San Jose and his wife, Claudia, pledged $250 million to create a research institute operated by the University of Colorado system. The couple tied for fourth with Ted Turner, founder of CNN and Turner Broadcasting System whose pledge went to establish a Nuclear Threat Initiative. The fifth-largest donation was an anonymous pledge of $230 million for unrestricted use at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

mk99
01-27-2002, 08:00 PM
I am sure most donations were made not in cash but in stock. At the peak of the tech bubble, many people found themselves extremely wealthy on paper. Since then many stocks have come down a lot and even if you gave the same amount of shares this year vs. last year the corresponding $ amounts would be significantly less.

Can you imagine if Bill Gates or one of his family members suffered a severe SCI? I wonder how long we would wait for a cure with an extra $5 or $10 billion in funding.... as evil as it sounds I think we need another high profile SCI to help us along.

Wise Young
01-28-2002, 06:33 AM
Actually, I saw an article in the New York Times magazine that may explain the drop in giving by the Gates Foundation. With the tremendous drop in stock prices, I think that they are using the opportunity to expand the foundation by making huge investments into companies. I am sorry but I cannot find the Times article again which appeared in the backpages of the New York Times business section... However, it was reported elsewhere. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation just filed papers indicating that they bought 5.4 million shares of the cable network company Cox Communication (about $200 million). His combined investment is $500 million).

http://www.internetnews.com/isp-news/article/0,,8_961661,00.html
http://www.washtech.com/news/telecom/14835-1.html

By the way, here is a web site that gives an up-to-date estimate of Bill Gates' wealth: $72 billion.
http://db.photo.net/WealthClock

DA
01-28-2002, 06:39 AM
can he spend 54 billion in his life time?
so why sit on it? i guess to show off. but it is his money, therefore he can sit on it all he wants. howecver mko is right, bill gates suffer a sci, the cure will come before the end of this year.

andrea
01-28-2002, 07:48 AM
Da,
maybe a good ''macumba'' could work or maybe all the mambers of this forum should concentrate at the same momemt all together on the same 'desire'.
None of us would go in geil if a terrible accident would occur to the 'pouer' richest man..
However the sad thing would be that he probably would be cured right away as an acute or sub acute injury and us chronics will remain with open mounth once more...

andrea

Wise Young
01-28-2002, 07:56 AM
DA, I am moving this thread to the Fundraising forum.

If there is one way to ensure that Bill Gates would never give to spinal cord injury research, it is to state in public that he or somebody close to him would get spinal cord injury.

Having spinal cord injury does not necessarily mean that one will give money to spinal cord injury research. There are many people who have spinal cord injury who have never given to spinal cord injury research even though they can afford it. I know several personally.

It is important for us to understand that the real message that must be put out is that the money will make a difference, that it will lead to a cure of spinal cord injury. When enough people become convinced of this, money will come.

It doesn't help when there are people who say that research will not provide a cure within our lifetime, that the field is overfunded and not using the money properly, and that more money will not help.

Wise.